CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > WoodWorking Machines > DIY-CNC Router Table Machines


DIY-CNC Router Table Machines Discuss the building of home-made CNC Router tables here!


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 02-10-2011, 01:36 PM
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 33
JC50 is on a distinguished road
Advice Needed

I built a DIY CNC router (gantry type) a couple of years ago. Built from MDF, 1" and 3/4" gas pipe, aluminum runners, skate bearings, etc. I purchased a Keling bundle of a Gecko 540, PSU, and 3 370oz motors (about $500 total). Got it working somewhat.
My problem was always repeatability. Meaning, I would make the first cuts, then when my G-code would go back and make the second and third deeper cuts, when it should have gone back to the same spot to start making the deeper cuts, it would not. When I was making only one shallow cut, the letters or whatever I was cutting would not be symmetrical. It wouldn't be off much, but enough to mess up my work. The computer I was using was a 2.4 GHz Intel system with 1GB memory and I also tried several different video cards (never used the built in video on the motherboard). I tried the trial Mach3 with WinXP and Linux/EMC, and always had high latency (approx 22K ns or whatever it measured in, if I remember correctly). After asking questions on this forum, we all decided I was losing steps. Not wanting to invest in another computer, I finally gave up and dismantled the whole system.

Now, I'm ready to try again. So my questions. Was I correct in that the high latency was causing the motor step loss, which in turn was causing my repeatability problems.....and what are some suggestions for a decent computer and operating system to run the system. I'm willing to spend a small amount on a computer, but I'm just scared whatever I end up with will have the same latency problem. As the topic title says, I need some advice.

P.S. I still have the original computer system stored in my attic just waiting to go back into action if anyone can offer some advice on how to lower the latency.
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 02-10-2011, 03:57 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 622
hemsworthlad is on a distinguished road

To be honest there's too meny variables to give any advice at this time without being connected to a machine.

I would recommend you build the new machine and see how it performs this time round.
If the parallel port was giving 5v and not 3.3v then I doubt latency was the problem and there's so meny other problems which could have caused it.

Carve one had a similiar problem and if I remember mariss fremarnis found the problem and it was something like the A+ A- & B+ B- wires on one of the motors was wrong way round causeing the pulse's to never reach full width before next pulse came along, effectivley causing missing steps.? Check C1 build.!

Good luck.
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 02-10-2011, 05:18 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 5,911
CarveOne is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by hemsworthlad View Post
To be honest there's too meny variables to give any advice at this time without being connected to a machine.

I would recommend you build the new machine and see how it performs this time round.
If the parallel port was giving 5v and not 3.3v then I doubt latency was the problem and there's so meny other problems which could have caused it.

Carve one had a similiar problem and if I remember mariss fremarnis found the problem and it was something like the A+ A- & B+ B- wires on one of the motors was wrong way round causeing the pulse's to never reach full width before next pulse came along, effectivley causing missing steps.? Check C1 build.!

Good luck.
Mariss asked me to check the DIR signals at the two X axis G203V drive modules (X and A) to verify that the voltages were 0v (< 0.3vdc) in one direction and 5v (> 4vdc) in the other direction. They were not meeting those conditions and the voltages were abnormal for TTL logic. I found that there were a couple of check boxes in the Mach3 Output Pins tab that were incorrect. Once those were corrected the step-over problem I could not figure out for months permanently disappeared.

I don't remember which settings they were now, but I'll see if I can find the info I posted in my Work Table CNC Machine log.

CarveOne
__________________
CarveOne
Resistance is not futile. It is voltage divided by current (R=V/I).
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 02-10-2011, 05:59 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 5,911
CarveOne is on a distinguished road

Here is what I posted in #1924 or so:

"I found the reason the A axis Dir terminal was not going to ~5vdc. Mach3 Config/Output pins settings were wrong. Outputs #2 thru #6 were disabled. Outputs #7 and #8 were enabled. Don't know why they were enabled. I disabled #7 and #8, saved, exited Mach3, loaded Mach3, and checked the Dir voltage again and now it is 4.85 vdc when it was 0.67vdc. A axis matches X axis voltages now."

There have been no problems with step-over due to missed steps from erroneous DIR voltages since that post.

CarveOne
__________________
CarveOne
Resistance is not futile. It is voltage divided by current (R=V/I).
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 02-10-2011, 06:09 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 622
hemsworthlad is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by CarveOne View Post
Mariss asked me to check the DIR signals at the two X axis G203V drive modules (X and A) to verify that the voltages were 0v (< 0.3vdc) in one direction and 5v (> 4vdc) in the other direction. They were not meeting those conditions and the voltages were abnormal for TTL logic. I found that there were a couple of check boxes in the Mach3 Output Pins tab that were incorrect. Once those were corrected the step-over problem I could not figure out for months permanently disappeared.

I don't remember which settings they were now, but I'll see if I can find the info I posted in my Work Table CNC Machine log.

CarveOne
Ok C1 seems like the only bit I remembered correct was Mariss helped out and the problem was fixed. . Either way I knew you were a very happy relieved. . . Lol
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 02-10-2011, 06:41 PM
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 33
JC50 is on a distinguished road
Thanks

Since I'm retired, I guess I have nothing better to do than to rebuild and try again. I'm thinking of going with a smaller machine and using 8020 aluminum. Since it's been 2 years since I built my first one, it's almost like starting all over again. So I guess it's time for the research to begin.

Again, thanks for the help. I'm sure I'll be asking more question, so stay tuned.
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 02-10-2011, 07:35 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 5,911
CarveOne is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by hemsworthlad View Post
Ok C1 seems like the only bit I remembered correct was Mariss helped out and the problem was fixed. . Either way I knew you were a very happy relieved. . . Lol
Seriously, that situation almost killed my interest in CNC machines. Somehow, Active Low was enabled and I don't think that is a default setting in a new installation of Mach3.

CarveOne
__________________
CarveOne
Resistance is not futile. It is voltage divided by current (R=V/I).
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RF-45 CNC Advice needed eartaker Benchtop Machines 568 01-05-2012 12:41 AM
advice needed teamjnz Haas Lathes 2 05-20-2009 05:19 PM
Advice needed. Terence E CNCzone Club House 0 05-14-2009 09:56 AM
advice needed / to buy or not??? teamjnz General Metal Working Machines 13 08-27-2008 08:48 AM
advice needed trubleshtr General Electronics Discussion 32 04-21-2005 08:48 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:32 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361