CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > WoodWorking Machines > DIY-CNC Router Table Machines


DIY-CNC Router Table Machines Discuss the building of home-made CNC Router tables here!


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 06-13-2005, 07:45 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: United States
Age: 55
Posts: 37
dfranks is on a distinguished road
Thought on Design found on Ebay

As I am new to CNC I have been doing tons of research before I start building. I came across a German made CNC router table on Ebay and thought it interesting. As I have examined the pics a little closer I began to wonder if the design was good or not. Here are some of the things that I noticed (as a novice of course).
1.) Very thick uprights on the gantry, maybe 1" or better? The width is not much larger than the width of the stepper motors. The height seem to be minimal as well. The overall working area is 15.75"x11.8"x4.3" though a 39.37"x23.6"x4.3" is available and is more of the size that I am looking to build.
2.) There is no bottom to the gantry. It looks like the X axis rails (rods?) may be pressed in? Anyway I was wondering how stable this would be. The horizontal brace(?) connecting both left and right sides of the gantry appear to be thin, almost more decorative than structural.
3.) There are 2 Y axis ballscrews. I don't know why the idea tends to 'freak me out' but for some reason it does. (I realize that you have to use a controller that supports 2 Y steppers.) I am assuming that if you just use 1 ballscrew on the Y axis that binding is going to occur. Also notice the box mounted under the X axis stepper motor. What's up with that?

So any opinions or other observations? I can see where you might save a few bucks on materials with this design. Oh by the way here is the link to this item on Ebay http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...522534852&rd=1
You may want to check out their site which is listed within the Ebay ad as it has more pics and a few videos. Hopefully I pasted the pics below correctly.



Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 06-13-2005, 08:09 PM
ger21's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Shelby Twp, MI....USA
Posts: 20,446
ger21 is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

Thats a pretty light duty machine. Keep in mind that unsupported rails will always have a bit of sag and flex.

3) I like to call that the X-axis, with the Y-axis being the axis on the gantry. I think you're right, without beefing up that gantry quite a bit, it would bind if not using 2 screws. Those little black boxes appear to be the stepper drives.

That's a nice machine for doing engraving or balsa work, but not really designed for anything heavier.
__________________
Gerry

Mach3 2010 Screenset
http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 06-13-2005, 10:32 PM
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 263
Dave's_Not_Here is on a distinguished road
The Gantry...

... looks to me to be tied together with wide Aluminum plate across the back where the logo is placed...

A channel for the the cable runs across the top... does not appear to be intended for any serious structural support...

Looked at their site... they seem to be able to mill Composit, MDF and Billet Aluminum in their videos...

Hummmm....
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 06-13-2005, 11:02 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Australia
Age: 37
Posts: 68
Jayson is on a distinguished road

I would agree that the x axis being suspended just on the rods is not ideal. This is a similar design to my machine however my x axis rails are supported. I run 2 screws on the x axis of my current machine both briven off the same stepper but when number 2 comes around I will be going to 1. If you are planning to build a machine based aroung this type of design all I can say is modify it a little then go for it...

Hopefully there will be an image of my machine attached to the bottom of this post. Its only a small image but I can take more if required.

Regards,

Jayson Wallis
(Horsham, Victoria, Australia)

http://www.cnczone.com/gallery/showp...00/ppuser/6402
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 06-13-2005, 11:37 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: United States
Age: 55
Posts: 37
dfranks is on a distinguished road

Jayson - That is very ingenious on how you are driving both X axis ballscrews off of 1 stepper! What is the actual size that you can cut on your table? On your next design did you mean that you are going to only use 1 ballscrew for the X axis or still use 2 ballscrews and 1 motor for each? Any suggestions on what type of drive (controller?) that 2 X axis steppers can be driven by? I'm still researching as to what desigin I am actually going to use. I have been looking at Beezer's design pretty close. It's very close to what I have been envisioning. Now I will have to look your design over as well. Thanks for the comments. Post more pics if you have them.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6  
Old 06-14-2005, 08:20 AM
spalm's Avatar
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 578
spalm is on a distinguished road

Maybe the little black boxes are just cheap "project" boxes used to contain the splices of the motor wires to the cables. Not a bad idea if so.
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 06-14-2005, 09:20 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Australia
Age: 37
Posts: 68
Jayson is on a distinguished road

Hi All,

In the next design I plan on using 1 motor and 1 thread for the x axis, mounted under the table in the centre. The work area of my current machine is 280mm(Y) x 500mm(X) x 100mm(Z). I can not suggest a controller that will allow you to run 2 motors as I have not done anything of that nature. Good luck with your researching and forget ever sleeping especially after the machine is built... Geez I wish I could stay home and play and still get paid :-)

By the way, I uploaded sone more pics to my gallery for you.

Regards,

Jayson.
(Horshan, Victoria, Australia)
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 10-08-2007, 11:20 AM
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: england
Posts: 20
mad.sculpture is on a distinguished road

Hi,whilst looking around at different designs i came upon this also.
the bit i thought was good was those 1" blocks you mentioned on y slides supporting x rails because if you as a hobbyist had these cnc'd for you there wouldn't be much to cock up as far as alignment goes,you'd know x&y pretty good,flat sheet(poss thick) accross back between these and also on top and the x would be quite solid for low end machine.
thing is other than the z axis most everything else could come from marchant dice type people and be simple to align.plus if someone started selling 2 blocks like these which could i think be common to each other if you wanted a machine different sizes it'd be so easy to change as determined only by rod lengths really,you couldn't easily screw it up could you?
too much sag in rails, make 20 mm rail all round supported y rails actualy would be easy to do anyway.
wouldn't it be a great alternative to mdf for us newbies.
Never been able to see why marchant dice not do something like this,you can buy all the saddle blocks end end supports but why can't they publish more complete info as to how they all go together,you can by a complete twin round rail axis set but you still have to get the bits machined to take your leadscrew fittings etc and this could introduce errors.the set looks like cool vesatile axis fot 140 quid,but if you look what they charge for that axis with that bit of machining done it's like 500 quid.
as machining in volume brings prices down it makes sense for marchant dice type suppliers to get it done at source and charge a bit for it rather than us lot getting it done piecemeal.
Ross.
Reply With Quote

  #9   Ban this user!
Old 10-08-2007, 06:47 PM
Regnar's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 427
Regnar is on a distinguished road

Did anyone notice that the z axis is only supported by the bottom of the rails. Seems it would flex under load.
Reply With Quote

  #10  
Old 10-10-2007, 08:23 AM
*Registered User*
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: England
Age: 51
Posts: 101
marchantdice is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by mad.sculpture View Post
Hi,whilst looking around at different designs i came upon this also.
the bit i thought was good was those 1" blocks you mentioned on y slides supporting x rails because if you as a hobbyist had these cnc'd for you there wouldn't be much to cock up as far as alignment goes,you'd know x&y pretty good,flat sheet(poss thick) accross back between these and also on top and the x would be quite solid for low end machine.
thing is other than the z axis most everything else could come from marchant dice type people and be simple to align.plus if someone started selling 2 blocks like these which could i think be common to each other if you wanted a machine different sizes it'd be so easy to change as determined only by rod lengths really,you couldn't easily screw it up could you?
too much sag in rails, make 20 mm rail all round supported y rails actualy would be easy to do anyway.
wouldn't it be a great alternative to mdf for us newbies.
Never been able to see why marchant dice not do something like this,you can buy all the saddle blocks end end supports but why can't they publish more complete info as to how they all go together,you can by a complete twin round rail axis set but you still have to get the bits machined to take your leadscrew fittings etc and this could introduce errors.the set looks like cool vesatile axis fot 140 quid,but if you look what they charge for that axis with that bit of machining done it's like 500 quid.
as machining in volume brings prices down it makes sense for marchant dice type suppliers to get it done at source and charge a bit for it rather than us lot getting it done piecemeal.
Ross.
Ross, I think you answered your own question...
We offer quality with a warrantee
as for the price
£500 - 30% for our master distributors = £350
3.5 hours labour £157.50 = £192.50 less the price of the stock!
Regards / Kevin
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #11   Ban this user!
Old 10-10-2007, 09:45 AM
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: england
Posts: 20
mad.sculpture is on a distinguished road
Fair Play i guess

Hi kevin,
ok, fairy nuff, i'm out of touch with hourly rates having done too many duff jobs lately.I'm used to what the local engineer used to charge my last company i worked for for one offs,but they were to become rolling orders in future so machinist prob. did them as lost leader.

At the time I wrote I couldn't imagine anybody ever using the components without having the holes for leadscrew through the saddle and endframes,specifications may vary but thought there would be a kind of 'common denominator' smallest size that at least could be opened up by customer if necessary.I've got a cheap ass drill press but wouldn't like to go through that size lump of alloy on it.
It's frustrating as a non mechanical engineering person who mainly want's to do cnc art on a low budget in a house i don't own(ie. can't stick workshop in garden)that you need to have a load of machining tools
and the wherewithall/wokshop to use them to be able to make the poduct that will then render many of them obsolete and make it a (relative)doddle to cut accurately.
I was thinking at the time to buy rockiffe plan and try to make it in alloy.
I then saw the rail assembly and thought i'd be able to make just about any machine i'd need for 3 * £140 ish for sliding elements exluding screws
then when i saw cost of machined ready to use item it burst my bubble because I realised it's going to be 3 times more expensive.
sometimes seems the only way doing something as a hobby bit by bit is cheaper is because you don't see the whole bill at one time.
Again it'll be down to my lack of knowledge about machining but I had no idea from what I perceived to be the necessary work that the unit would take 3.5 hours for a professional.

Sorry if I annoyed you,thankyou for reply

Regards Ross
Reply With Quote

  #12   Ban this user!
Old 10-10-2007, 09:40 PM
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 717
sansbury is on a distinguished road

You could always look for a fellow hobbyist with a more developed shop setup to help out. What you're looking for is not complicated and doesn't even need CNC to get it right-just a good mill and tooling and a steady hand with a ruler. A hobbyist also doesn't have to cover rent, employee overhead, investments in tooling and equipment, advertising, etc. There might very well be somebody out there who'd be delighted to help for $100 or even a good bottle of Scotch.
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:33 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361