Build Thread Linear motion: V-groove or skate bearings?


Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Linear motion: V-groove or skate bearings?

  1. #1
    Registered
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Linear motion: V-groove or skate bearings?

    This is my first post here. I've been reading this forum for a while, until I decided what type and details of my project.
    Now I'm drawing the plants, and would like to have your thoughts about this topic.
    Almost all design here uses carriages with 4 skate bearings attached to a v profile, running over a v-profile.
    Why don't use a v-groove bearing running over a v-profile? Is the cost of the bearings the only reason?
    What would be the pros and cons of v-groove bearings?

    thanks in advance

    Similar Threads:


  2. #2
    Member ger21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Shelby Township
    Posts
    35538
    Downloads
    1
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    The V-groove bearings are far superior imo. Most of the designs you see using Skateboard bearings are older designs. The V Bearings in the past were about $25 each, which made them about 25x more expensive than skate bearings. Only in the last year or two did they become more affordable, now about $12-$13 each. You'll see that a few newer designs are using the V bearings, including Joe's popular 4 x 4 Hybrid.

    Gerry

    UCCNC 2017 Screenset
    [URL]http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2017.html[/URL]

    Mach3 2010 Screenset
    [URL]http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2010.html[/URL]

    JointCAM - CNC Dovetails & Box Joints
    [URL]http://www.g-forcecnc.com/jointcam.html[/URL]

    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)


  3. #3
    Registered
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    That was precisely my understanding. It makes the building process easier, too.



  4. #4
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    6
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Hi,
    I'm also interested on design a machine using V-Groove bearings. But what problems can be with this kind of design? Must i drill the guide and support holes with another CNC? I can use only hand tools....

    Thank you



  5. #5
    Registered amishx64's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    390
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default V-Groove Advantage

    Quote Originally Posted by cerberos View Post
    Hi,
    I'm also interested on design a machine using V-Groove bearings. But what problems can be with this kind of design? Must i drill the guide and support holes with another CNC? I can use only hand tools....

    Thank you
    Many of us on the forum have built our own machines without the use of another CNC. This makes things considerably harder, but still doable. I was able to build mine without a CNC, but I also used things like an out-of-square miter saw and a cheap drill press.

    V-groove bearings would make your life a bit easier over skate bearings because you only have to worry about getting the mounting holes in a nice straight line. With skateboard bearings, you need many more, and the bearings need to me mounted accurately on three axises on another piece of angled material vs 2 axises on flat material with the v-groove.



  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5516
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    My opinions are on the fence about this. I do like the simplicity of construction. And definitely tune up is easier, especially if you use eccentric bolts for adjustment. Even though multiple bearings have to be used, there could be a benefit of having the "load" of the bearings distributed, putting less stress on the system. Plus no one can argue the cost

    While not necessary a problem, I do feel some design considerations should be considered to prevent overloading the bearings. For example if a design incorporates either a tall or heavy gantry, it might be beneficial to widen the bearing distance, or at least keep its weight centered between the bearings.



  7. #7
    Registered amishx64's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    390
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    louieatienza, I agree with your thoughts. Also though, if you are using a very heavy gantry, I don't think I'd recommend even using V or skate bearings.

    Where are you guys buying the bearings? I seem to be seeing ~$8 for one bearing. Surly that can't be right.



  8. #8
    Member ger21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Shelby Township
    Posts
    35538
    Downloads
    1
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    I bought mine here. http://www.cadcamcadcam.com/v-groovewheel2.aspx
    But I might go with larger ones from VXB for my X and Y axis, but I'll need to fabricate my own eccentrics, or find another source, as VXB doesn't sell them.

    If you download the Dual V catalog from Bishop Wisecarver, it gives load ratings and how to calculate them for the different sizes of Dual V's. The larger ones have very high load ratings, but can be expensive.

    As far as fabricating, I think a drill press would be the minimum requirement. By using a fence, it's easy to get the holes in a straight line, and perpendicular to the face.

    Gerry

    UCCNC 2017 Screenset
    [URL]http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2017.html[/URL]

    Mach3 2010 Screenset
    [URL]http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2010.html[/URL]

    JointCAM - CNC Dovetails & Box Joints
    [URL]http://www.g-forcecnc.com/jointcam.html[/URL]

    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)


  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5516
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ger21 View Post
    I bought mine here. http://www.cadcamcadcam.com/v-groovewheel2.aspx
    But I might go with larger ones from VXB for my X and Y axis, but I'll need to fabricate my own eccentrics, or find another source, as VXB doesn't sell them.

    If you download the Dual V catalog from Bishop Wisecarver, it gives load ratings and how to calculate them for the different sizes of Dual V's. The larger ones have very high load ratings, but can be expensive.

    As far as fabricating, I think a drill press would be the minimum requirement. By using a fence, it's easy to get the holes in a straight line, and perpendicular to the face.
    ger21, I believe IMService sells the eccentric bolts, for a very reasonable price.

    amishx64, the great widgetmaster had a build that used v-groove bearings, and though only 24 square by 9 high travvel in the z, the bearings still failed, despite doubling them in the direction of force. Granted it was an all-aluminum construction, but the weight, high z and relatively small bearing spread seemed to lead to their failure. He eventually rebuilt the machine with linear slides.

    I think however, for the y or z axis, where there is less weight, the v-grooves might perform better, and you get the advantage of the low-profile design i.e. carriage tighter to gantry...

    edit: Just noticed this thread must have one of the lowest reply to view ratios ever....



  10. #10
    Member ger21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Shelby Township
    Posts
    35538
    Downloads
    1
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by louieatienza View Post
    ger21, I believe IMService sells the eccentric bolts, for a very reasonable price.
    They are even cheaper if you buy them with the bearings. I actually did purchase some with my bearings.

    However, what I said was, that I want to use larger size bearings from VXB, and they don't have larger size eccentrics available.

    Quote Originally Posted by louieatienza View Post
    amishx64, the great widgetmaster had a build that used v-groove bearings, and though only 24 square by 9 high travvel in the z, the bearings still failed, despite doubling them in the direction of force. Granted it was an all-aluminum construction, but the weight, high z and relatively small bearing spread seemed to lead to their failure. He eventually rebuilt the machine with linear slides.

    I think however, for the y or z axis, where there is less weight, the v-grooves might perform better, and you get the advantage of the low-profile design i.e. carriage tighter to gantry...
    WidgetMaster used the small #1 size bearings, and imo his design far exceeded their load ratings. Also be aware that when using this size bearing with bushings, that the entire load is being carried by #6 size bolts.

    It's really quite simple. The bearings have both axial and radial load ratings. Don't exceed the ratings, and they'll work fine. ShopBot's been using them for 15 years.

    For the Z axis of the router I'm currently designing, I plan on using #3 bearings. The top (load carrying) bearings are rated for almost 700lbs each, and 380lbs axially. And by nit using a bushing, they are mounted with12mm bolts, which are plenty strong.

    Gerry

    UCCNC 2017 Screenset
    [URL]http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2017.html[/URL]

    Mach3 2010 Screenset
    [URL]http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2010.html[/URL]

    JointCAM - CNC Dovetails & Box Joints
    [URL]http://www.g-forcecnc.com/jointcam.html[/URL]

    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


About CNCzone.com

    We are the largest and most active discussion forum for manufacturing industry. The site is 100% free to join and use, so join today!

Follow us on


Our Brands

Linear motion: V-groove or skate bearings?

Linear motion: V-groove or skate bearings?