Mach4+ESS or Acorn? - Page 2


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: Mach4+ESS or Acorn?

  1. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    85
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Mach4+ESS or Acorn?

    Quote Originally Posted by CNCMAN172 View Post

    The Acorn takes the bulk of intensive calculations on their Acorn controller, Windows is just doing the screen, not the pulsing work.

    This is why I chose Acorn. The Acorn processor only has to juggle one ball. Look at your Windows task manager sometime...It's a little scary.

    I had a commercially-built router that ran WinCNC, it was very stable and seemed easy to customize. I looked into it for my machine but Acorn ended up being about 1/4 the price.

    Acorn's support forum is very good, my first issue (turned out to be Windows related, ha!) had a moderator response within one hour.



  2. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    943
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Mach4+ESS or Acorn?

    Quote Originally Posted by kmagyoyo View Post
    This is why I chose Acorn. The Acorn processor only has to juggle one ball. Look at your Windows task manager sometime...It's a little scary.

    I had a commercially-built router that ran WinCNC, it was very stable and seemed easy to customize. I looked into it for my machine but Acorn ended up being about 1/4 the price.
    The ESS works the same, it does the time critical tasks onboard not Windows. The ESS and many other controllers are also cheaper than the Acorn with more features.



  3. #23
    Member ger21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Shelby Township
    Posts
    35538
    Downloads
    1
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Mach4+ESS or Acorn?

    My understanding is that the Acorn does not work the same as the ESS or CNC Drive controllers.
    I beleive the Acorn does the trajectory planning in hardware, rather than in software like all the other controllers do.
    I may be mistaken, though?

    Gerry

    UCCNC 2017 Screenset
    [URL]http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2017.html[/URL]

    Mach3 2010 Screenset
    [URL]http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2010.html[/URL]

    JointCAM - CNC Dovetails & Box Joints
    [URL]http://www.g-forcecnc.com/jointcam.html[/URL]

    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)


  4. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    644
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Mach4+ESS or Acorn?

    Quote Originally Posted by ger21 View Post
    My understanding is that the Acorn does not work the same as the ESS or CNC Drive controllers.
    I beleive the Acorn does the trajectory planning in hardware, rather than in software like all the other controllers do.
    I may be mistaken, though?
    I don't think so, trajectory planners are complex and need floating point so are likely implemented on the Windows side or perhaps the Beaglebones main CPU
    Step generation is probably done by one of the the Beaglebone 2 PRUs. The PRUs (Programmable Realtime Units) are 200 MHz fixed point 32 Bit CPUs
    used as real time co-processors for the Beaglebones main ARM CPU.



  5. #25
    Member samco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1753
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Mach4+ESS or Acorn?

    A note.. Linuxcnc's trajectory planner is running in realtime... (which is why things like threading and feedback type stuff works so well)



Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


About CNCzone.com

    We are the largest and most active discussion forum for manufacturing industry. The site is 100% free to join and use, so join today!

Follow us on


Our Brands

Mach4+ESS or Acorn?

Mach4+ESS or Acorn?