My carbon fiber CNC gantry - Page 3


Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 104

Thread: My carbon fiber CNC gantry

  1. #41
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    926
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: My carbon fiber CNC gantry

    Quote Originally Posted by louieatienza View Post
    Have you checked the g-code for the job, especially when it does the number 7? Sometimes CAM puts out crappy code... and sometimes the font, if translated from a Windows or Adobe font, can look "pixelated" even if it's a single line font. Sometimes on what appears to be a diagonal, CAM will spit out something like

    G1X0
    Y0
    X1
    Y1
    X2
    Y2

    and when you run this at speed it looks like it's a mechanical or electronics issue. Not saying that this is the case, but something to look at. Especially with some older machines.

    That's interesting. They use regular square and rectangle steel tubes. I was originally planning on using similar steel rectangle tubes for the gantry and frame on my build as they seemed to be relatively cost effective. I was unsure how thick the walls would need to be to deliver acceptable rigidity but I guess that it probably depends and few different things. That gantry looks fairly long in the pic.

    The good news with a hollow tube is that it can be filled to create extra stiffness. There is probably a lot of options that would help including more steel tubes to fill that cavity.

    If it were me, and I felt like experimenting, I would want to try reinforcing the center with strong steel bars and filling the rest of the cavity with a mix of epoxy granite (which apparently has a proven track record for creating rigid CNC bases with good vibration dampening) and a high shore hardness urethane rubber. I am sure others will have better advice that is based on actual CNC experience though.



  2. #42
    Registered rocrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    6
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: My carbon fiber CNC gantry

    Goemon , you keep going my friend , you are on the right path and will have a superior product when done .
    I am a marine project manager with an engineering background and fabricate for fun . Carbon has surpassed metals in just about every aspect in the marine environment,this including masts and the rigging used to hold it up as well as hull structures and sails .
    A carbon mast is both lighter and stiffer then its aluminum equivalent and localized reinforcing can be introduced into a design to either stiffen and area or to increase strength . Like with all new technologies you will get a fair amount of naysayers finding all the excuses in the world why it won't work ,but the early adopters usually get to enjoy the advances and understanding of the new tech .
    You will definitely produce a far stiffer component then a metal equivalent with a substantial weight saving ,which will give you the possibility of faster acceleration in the Y axis from point to point . This can add up to much faster job times if taken advantage of the weight saviing on a complex component .
    In the marine industry we deal with compression , tension ,torque and flex and carbon has been the best material so far to address all these loads . As you have continually pointed out ,the ensign is critical to achieving your goal of stiffness , and carbon can get you there the easiest .
    Just remember you may want to protect the bottom part of the gantry from micro impact from flying Swarf chips as this could eventually lead to a delamination failure from the continuous impact in the same area . Perhaps a sheet of stainless foil used for heat treating would work well here , it's available from McMaster and can be bonded to the gantry with ease .
    Please continue to describe the design and build , as I think the tech explains itself perfectly .
    Rocrat



  3. #43
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2134
    Downloads
    1
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: My carbon fiber CNC Gantry

    I'm glad you posted that video, when I first this I thought, ok you could do it, but why?

    Really interesting video, given that the one they made at the factory was very specifically engineered and manufactured, how comparable would the box sections you are using be for gantry use?

    cheers, Ian

    It's a state of mind!


  4. #44
    Member jono5axe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    65
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: My carbon fiber CNC gantry

    Very interesting thread for me, as I am just about to build a 4000mm long composite gantry. I have been procrastinating back and forth about it, and maybe just to use steel, but am pretty committed by now to doing it in composite. I therefore list my plan below, for the purpose of getting everyones comments. All comments and ideas gratefully accepted - to ensure I am not overlooking something....

    - Composite gantry beam 4000mm long x 600mm high x 400mm deep [RHS - rectangular hollow section].
    - Construction: Sandwich construction - 5mm foam core, internal laminate = 2mm quadraxlial glass fibre, external laminate = 4mm quadraxial carbon fibre & glass fibre (50%/50%), with transverse internal gussets/bulkheads every 300mm (bonded in).
    - Resin system = epoxy, infusion, room temp.
    - Method: vacuum infusion + hotbox post cure cycle. [make up core material as C-Section, lay-up inside C-Section, bond in transverse gussets, close C-Section by bonding on last side panel, vacuum infuse external laminate in one hit].
    - Thermal expansion goal is to achieve approximate equivalence with concrete [13x10-6 m/(mK)] and steel [12x10-06 m/(mK)], as side frames are steel and machine base is concrete floor. Thermal expansion co-efficient of epoxy GRP = 36x10-06 m/(mK), epoxy/carbon = 2x10-06 m/(mK).

    Metal threads will be achieved by either/or
    1) 50x8mm steel flatbar laminated into the core of the sandwich construction, or,
    2) Drilling beam and bonding in threaded inserts (with plexus/crestabond/etc)

    Datum faces (machine beds) for 35mm linear rails & 24x24mm gear rack will be produced by one of the following methods, either/or:
    1) Shimming components in place and then back-filling gaps with "Chock-it" [CHOCKFAST ORANGE (PR-610TCF)], or,
    2) Epoxy-concrete machine beds, molded on a 4000mm long flat table produced with self-leveling epoxy (make flat table mold using self-leveling epoxy, lay in the epoxy/sand/fibre mix on the table mold, place the gantry beam on top to bond the epoxy concrete machine beds to the beam.

    ??? forgotten something?...

    Like I said, all comments and ideals thanks very much.

    Regards,
    Jono



  5. #45
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3920
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: My carbon fiber CNC gantry

    Thanks for the post. I for one am very interested in the use of composites and such, as I have zero experience with the materials. As such I strongly suggest that when you get started on this, you start a build thread so that we can get another example of a build from beginning to end. Once a few proven builds get some time on this forum I think we will see more people considering alternative builds.


    Quote Originally Posted by jono5axe View Post
    Very interesting thread for me, as I am just about to build a 4000mm long composite gantry. I have been procrastinating back and forth about it, and maybe just to use steel, but am pretty committed by now to doing it in composite. I therefore list my plan below, for the purpose of getting everyones comments. All comments and ideas gratefully accepted - to ensure I am not overlooking something....

    - Composite gantry beam 4000mm long x 600mm high x 400mm deep [RHS - rectangular hollow section].
    That is a big beam.
    - Construction: Sandwich construction - 5mm foam core, internal laminate = 2mm quadraxlial glass fibre, external laminate = 4mm quadraxial carbon fibre & glass fibre (50%/50%), with transverse internal gussets/bulkheads every 300mm (bonded in).
    Interesting but it strikes me as a bit thin. I base this on the little bit (very little) I understand from boat building. There structural parts are often built up from many lamination that can end up inches thick. A 4mm shell laminate just strikes me as very thin to get any significant stiffness and freedom from vibration over that distance.
    - Resin system = epoxy, infusion, room temp.
    - Method: vacuum infusion + hotbox post cure cycle. [make up core material as C-Section, lay-up inside C-Section, bond in transverse gussets, close C-Section by bonding on last side panel, vacuum infuse external laminate in one hit].
    Again interesting and my experience here is so think as to be useless but wouldn't it be fear easier and lead to a much stronger beam if the beam was built up around a foam core? Of course 4000mm is a long stretch for foam so that core might need an internal support beam. In any event it just seems like doing two C beams and then trying to join them afterwards is going to be more difficult and time consuming.
    - Thermal expansion goal is to achieve approximate equivalence with concrete [13x10-6 m/(mK)] and steel [12x10-06 m/(mK)], as side frames are steel and machine base is concrete floor. Thermal expansion co-efficient of epoxy GRP = 36x10-06 m/(mK), epoxy/carbon = 2x10-06 m/(mK).

    Metal threads will be achieved by either/or
    1) 50x8mm steel flatbar laminated into the core of the sandwich construction, or,
    2) Drilling beam and bonding in threaded inserts (with plexus/crestabond/etc)
    How to handle this is a very interesting subject. I can't claim to have the right answer here but do have some experience with Epoxy Granite machine tool bases and parts. The biggest problem with thread inserts is that they do not have a strong resistance to pull out. The other problem is that threaded inserts, bars or whatever need to be thick enough to properly hold threads. So you end up taking about plates that 8 to 10 mm thinks that have to be molded in or inserts similarly thick. This brings up real questions about how you will place such inserts and keep them bonded in place.

    I know in Epoxy Granite solutions thread inserts are weak points in a structure. In your design I would see threaded inserts as an even weaker solution due to the thin walls you are talking about on the carbon fiber laminate.
    Datum faces (machine beds) for 35mm linear rails & 24x24mm gear rack will be produced by one of the following methods, either/or:
    1) Shimming components in place and then back-filling gaps with "Chock-it" [CHOCKFAST ORANGE (PR-610TCF)], or,
    2) Epoxy-concrete machine beds, molded on a 4000mm long flat table produced with self-leveling epoxy (make flat table mold using self-leveling epoxy, lay in the epoxy/sand/fibre mix on the table mold, place the gantry beam on top to bond the epoxy concrete machine beds to the beam.

    ??? forgotten something?...

    Like I said, all comments and ideals thanks very much.

    Regards,
    Jono
    Like I said above I really want to see another machine build of this sort.

    If you have access to the CAD software and engineering experience I would suggest modeling your beam for stiffness and vibration. Vibration is key here as that can have a very negative impact on machining quality. I have. a gut feeling (very gut feeling) that you will need a beam that is thicker than 4 mm on the shell laminate to get a suitably stiff beam over 4000 mm. What might save you here is the overall size of the beam but you will need plenty of internal gusseting to keep the beam walls from vibrating.



  6. #46
    Registered
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Afghanistan
    Posts
    3
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: My carbon fiber CNC gantry

    We've been making carbon fibre gantries for some time… and just stopped.

    In our application, we had to make a 10 metre wide machine which would move at 1 metre/sec or faster and support a weight of 100 kgs with moderate accuracy. The flex and the torsion of the gantry had to be low. Yes, we're not talking about mill accuracy but adequate for the purpose, say ± 0.3mm.

    Carbon or aluminium were the choices with a monocoque carbon gantry seeming like a good choice compared with a fabricated aluminium one. The layup engineering was done by outside contractors with experience of masts and other high load carbon products.

    The gantry was made from pre-preg and nomex core. My experience is that pre-preg is fast and clean and offers much better integrity than resin infusion where you can quite easily get failures in the infusion process giving bubbles and delimitation.

    The mould was fairly immense and used a bladder to inflate to 3-4 atmospheres instead of vacuum bagging. The entire mould was fitted into a fabricated autoclave with heaters to get it up over 120ºC.

    After some months of use, it was obvious that there was some sag in the gantry so the next versions used a heavier and heavier layup. I can't be sure, but my guess is that sag is a fact of life unless you have a truly massively thick layup.

    In spite of the fairly substantial mould, there was some distortion in the finished product because of the pressure used in the bladder. Attaching parts is somewhat problematic since accurate location is difficult with the mould.

    The gantry is also noisy. Because it is hollow and fairly stiff, any vibration is amplified like beating a drum skin. Unless you add something like Kevlar, this is a fact of life with carbon.

    What made us stop this method of construction was mainly the space required for the mould and autoclave but also the noise and sagging. We decided that for our requirements, fast and light, that aluminium would be better. Note, that cost was not a decisive factor but there's no doubt that the alu version is going to be cheaper.

    For a CNC machine, honestly, I can't see the point. You normally don't need more speed than you can get from a lead screw because cutting tools won't really go very fast. You do need to damp vibration and carbon doesn't look great there. You will need some compression strength and carbon fails there too.

    There's no doubt that carbon is sexy as far as outward appearances go and in some applications where weight and strength are critical, carbon offers a lot but where weight is not a big issue, then metal looks more interesting and at a fraction of the cost and complexity.

    D



  7. #47
    Member jono5axe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    65
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: My carbon fiber CNC gantry

    Hello Dermot, thanks for that info, very interesting. My beam is for a gantry router, and it is moving at 1.0m/s and with acceleration of 2 m/s2 (designed for, at least). What was the cross-section dimensions of your beam? I have a couple of comments re your points below:

    Quote Originally Posted by DermotMcD View Post
    We've been making carbon fibre gantries for some time… and just stopped.

    In our application, we had to make a 10 metre wide machine which would move at 1 metre/sec or faster and support a weight of 100 kgs with moderate accuracy. The flex and the torsion of the gantry had to be low. Yes, we're not talking about mill accuracy but adequate for the purpose, say ± 0.3mm.

    Carbon or aluminium were the choices with a monocoque carbon gantry seeming like a good choice compared with a fabricated aluminium one. The layup engineering was done by outside contractors with experience of masts and other high load carbon products.

    The gantry was made from pre-preg and nomex core. My experience is that pre-preg is fast and clean and offers much better integrity than resin infusion where you can quite easily get failures in the infusion process giving bubbles and delimitation.

    The mould was fairly immense and used a bladder to inflate to 3-4 atmospheres instead of vacuum bagging. The entire mould was fitted into a fabricated autoclave with heaters to get it up over 120ºC.

    After some months of use, it was obvious that there was some sag in the gantry so the next versions used a heavier and heavier layup. I can't be sure, but my guess is that sag is a fact of life unless you have a truly massively thick layup.D
    I would have expected that additional laminate thickness would have only limited effect on deflection, and may possibly increase deflection by increasing weight. The cross-section needs to increase in size to reduce deflection. For example, if you use a steel RHS and get excessive deflection, increasing the wall thickness will not have much effect, but choosing a bigger RHS will certainly reduce deflection. Of course, this is problematic if you have already made a mold...

    I suppose that we are not really going to achieve zero deflection on large structures, and are more interested in a consistent deflection which is not affected by tool forces.

    Quote Originally Posted by DermotMcD View Post
    In spite of the fairly substantial mould, there was some distortion in the finished product because of the pressure used in the bladder. Attaching parts is somewhat problematic since accurate location is difficult with the mould.

    The gantry is also noisy. Because it is hollow and fairly stiff, any vibration is amplified like beating a drum skin. Unless you add something like Kevlar, this is a fact of life with carbon.

    What made us stop this method of construction was mainly the space required for the mould and autoclave but also the noise and sagging. We decided that for our requirements, fast and light, that aluminium would be better. Note, that cost was not a decisive factor but there's no doubt that the alu version is going to be cheaper.

    For a CNC machine, honestly, I can't see the point. You normally don't need more speed than you can get from a lead screw because cutting tools won't really go very fast. You do need to damp vibration and carbon doesn't look great there. You will need some compression strength and carbon fails there too.
    From my research it seems that composites (both carbon laminate, GRP, and especially resin/aggregate castings) are better at vibration damping than steel/Al, maybe 5 times better, and this is a primary reason for trying to use it (maybe incorrect, more comments pls?). We are routering soft materials and certainly need speed, and long travels, so more speed than a long ballscrew can do (i.e. we need 1 m/s) before buckling, so use gear rack. We do need speed, and this would be typical for a lot of gantry routers/mills.

    An important reason to consider composites is to keep weight down. In steel my 4000mm gantry design comes in at a ton, and therefore the performance comes down and the machine/servo spec goes up (costs go up). My composite design can be less than half that weight, and will perform to specs (? hopefully). It seems logical that as a gantry machine gets larger, and if it needs speed, then keeping gantry weight down is a primary concern.

    Another reason to consider composites is the issue of how do you actually build a large steel or aluminium gantry beam? RHS is not available for that (not big enough), so you are welding, and therefore not straight anymore, and also full of residual weld stresses (RHS also has residual stresses?). I have just been quoted $4000 for having my welded steel side frames stress relieved in an oven, and there are not many large ovens around. So, maybe use thinner sections? folded and riveted to avoid weld stresses? but still you need to provide machine beds for rails etc, which may need welding on, and which have to be machined, which is more difficult for a large (long) machine bed, and has cost. So, it is interesting to consider if the composite materials can be used to eliminate weld-stresses (and the weld stress relieving process step and cost) and also eliminate machining cost by using epoxy/aggregate/fibre cast machine ways. [of course, machine ways could be bonded onto a steel/Al beam using modern composites structural adhesives....]

    I don't agree that a carbon tube or rectangular section has no compression strength, this is not correct.

    These are some of my thoughts, maybe sensible, maybe not...

    regards
    Jono

    Quote Originally Posted by DermotMcD View Post
    There's no doubt that carbon is sexy as far as outward appearances go and in some applications where weight and strength are critical, carbon offers a lot but where weight is not a big issue, then metal looks more interesting and at a fraction of the cost and complexity.

    D




  8. #48
    Registered
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Afghanistan
    Posts
    3
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: My carbon fiber CNC gantry

    Hello Jono,

    What was the cross-section dimensions of your beam? I have a couple of comments re your points below:
    Approx 320 x 240.

    In fact the mould was made from stock U channel sections and a custom corner quarter round so we could scale it up or down by using different channel sections or multiples of same.

    I suppose that we are not really going to achieve zero deflection on large structures, and are more interested in a consistent deflection which is not affected by tool forces.
    Agreed. The biggest problem we wanted to avoid was torque twisting of the gantry so that a constant Y movement resulted in a curve. We wanted a deflection of less than 5mm with a centre load of 85 kgs. i.e. someone sitting in the middle!

    I think if we had taken the original carbon layup specs and doubled or trebled them, we would have got a better structure long term. Most people who spec carbon are after minimum weight and might say a 0.9mm web separated by 6mm of nomex from another is adequate for a skin but they're probably designing an America's cup hull which can sink as soon as it crosses the line while we're doing machines which might have a 25 year service life… or more.

    As it was, it's fit for purpose as far as the customers are concerned but there are so many variables outside our control that after 15 years, I would prefer to look down another road.

    We do need speed, and this would be typical for a lot of gantry routers/mills. It seems logical that as a gantry machine gets larger, and if it needs speed, then keeping gantry weight down is a primary concern.
    Agreed. However I think that using fabricated or welded aluminium truss sections may be better in many ways than composites. A competitor built a similar machine and the all up weight was about 500 kgs (probably 5 times ours) and the cost of driving this at any reasonable speed was insane.

    I don't agree that a carbon tube or rectangular section has no compression strength, this is not correct.
    I'm only quoting my carbon guru here. I was interested in using a carbon "conrod" in an oscillating mechanism and was told off big time. You'd imagine that the light weight would keep the forces down but apparently that type of end on load does not work.

    These are some of my thoughts, maybe sensible, maybe not...
    Well we're all groping in the dark to some extent or other!

    D



  9. #49
    Member jono5axe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    65
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: My carbon fiber CNC gantry

    Hello Dermot

    320 x 240 (I am assuming mm) is not a very big section for a 10m gantry span, sounds like you just needed a bigger section, irrespective of material (carbon or aluminium or steel). I don't think that the choice of carbon as the material is the problem.

    Maybe a carbon tube truss structure. Buy in the tubes already made, cut them to size, bond them together using a methacrylate structural adhesive. Room temp. No autoclave required. No welding. To easy (?)

    Regards,
    Jono



  10. #50
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    735
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: My carbon fiber CNC gantry

    Really interesting discussion. I've never worked with composite fabrication but I've been interested in the subject for awhile. Specifically as it relates to constructing a carbon fiber gantry like what Goemon is undertaking. Dermot McD - keeping in mind I know next to nothing about CF, it would seem like you could eliminate (partially) sag in your 10M gantry by incorporating a truss or arch shape?



  11. #51
    Registered rocrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    6
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: My carbon fiber CNC gantry

    Has anyone thought of using a marine spar manufacturer . I have just had a 30 m tube come out of the oven at Southern Spars in South Africa . Next in is a rectangular box section for a longeron on a catamaran . This longeron will overhang the forward beam by 3m or 10' unsupported and has a tip deflection of less than 1/2" or 12mm with a 5000Kg 12000 lbs upward load .
    I'm sure the same section would not have any deflection in the middle if supported both ends like in a gantry on a cnc machine .
    It's all about the sectional dimension and the laminate spec . There are also various modulus's of carbon that can factor into the engineering for the amount of stiffness . The mast tube I spoke of above uses high modulus carbon in both unidirectional and woven twill to stop any torsional movement in the section and to engineer a deflectional stiff mast .
    Perhaps a mast section would work a charm with its oval type shape , this would put the linear rails on a different axis from each other which may support the up force of the tool on the material better then in a regular flat surface . It may apply the load to the rail in a more even spread over both bearing rows . It may be a good exercise to calculate the load spread on a linear rail .



  12. #52
    Registered rocrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    6
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: My carbon fiber CNC gantry

    Jumper , sag can easily be taken out of a 10 m gantry by the inclusion of a tension member in the form of a short compression post hung off the gantry underneath in the middle and a tensioning cable or dyneema line attached at either end of the gantry and supported on the post in the middle . By tensioning the line you can pull out the sag or even put prebend in the opposite direction . Obviously it could not be lower then the tooling to stop any collision .
    If the section is deep enough this could even be done inside the tube if hollow and it would not add any substantial weight . Come to think of it , if done inside the tube the post is not even necessary as you could slot the lower surface of the tube and pass the line through the slot and over a fair surface like a piece of round bar fastened over the slot .



  13. #53
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    926
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: My carbon fiber CNC gantry

    Quote Originally Posted by jono5axe View Post
    Very interesting thread for me, as I am just about to build a 4000mm long composite gantry. I have been procrastinating back and forth about it, and maybe just to use steel, but am pretty committed by now to doing it in composite. I therefore list my plan below, for the purpose of getting everyones comments. All comments and ideas gratefully accepted - to ensure I am not overlooking something....

    - Composite gantry beam 4000mm long x 600mm high x 400mm deep [RHS - rectangular hollow section].
    - Construction: Sandwich construction - 5mm foam core, internal laminate = 2mm quadraxlial glass fibre, external laminate = 4mm quadraxial carbon fibre & glass fibre (50%/50%), with transverse internal gussets/bulkheads every 300mm (bonded in).
    - Resin system = epoxy, infusion, room temp.
    - Method: vacuum infusion + hotbox post cure cycle. [make up core material as C-Section, lay-up inside C-Section, bond in transverse gussets, close C-Section by bonding on last side panel, vacuum infuse external laminate in one hit].
    - Thermal expansion goal is to achieve approximate equivalence with concrete [13x10-6 m/(mK)] and steel [12x10-06 m/(mK)], as side frames are steel and machine base is concrete floor. Thermal expansion co-efficient of epoxy GRP = 36x10-06 m/(mK), epoxy/carbon = 2x10-06 m/(mK).

    Metal threads will be achieved by either/or
    1) 50x8mm steel flatbar laminated into the core of the sandwich construction, or,
    2) Drilling beam and bonding in threaded inserts (with plexus/crestabond/etc)

    Datum faces (machine beds) for 35mm linear rails & 24x24mm gear rack will be produced by one of the following methods, either/or:
    1) Shimming components in place and then back-filling gaps with "Chock-it" [CHOCKFAST ORANGE (PR-610TCF)], or,
    2) Epoxy-concrete machine beds, molded on a 4000mm long flat table produced with self-leveling epoxy (make flat table mold using self-leveling epoxy, lay in the epoxy/sand/fibre mix on the table mold, place the gantry beam on top to bond the epoxy concrete machine beds to the beam.

    ??? forgotten something?...

    Like I said, all comments and ideals thanks very much.

    Regards,
    Jono

    Sounds like we are following a similar path (just on a different scale). After researching until my brain melted and poured out of my ears, I also decided to go with an epoxy granite machine base for my CNC build. The first section is curing right now.

    looking at your plan, one thing to think about is going to be your choice of resin. With the sizes you are talking about, heat curing is going to be difficult with most traditional heat cure epoxy resins but there could be issues with most room temp cure resins.

    Most of the lower cost hobby level resins have fairly low heat deflection temperatures. This is the temp they start to soften under load. Some are as low as 110 degrees F which is far from ideal for precision machine parts. This issue is most commonly addressed by using a quality resin and post curing at 250 or 350 degrees to raise the heat deflection temp.

    obviously it's going to be hard to fit 3000mm beams in the oven but there are a few good alternatives:

    I have recently started testing a new room temp epoxy called Adtech 820. It has a heat deflection temp of over 180 degrees with no post curing. It's more expensive than regular laminating resins but worth it for this.

    There is a low (ish) cost heat cure resin called "Max HTE" available on eBay. If curing ovens are not available for larger parts, the curing process can be completed using Ir heat lamps or even by leaving the parts outside on a sunny day. This resin has a deflection temp of 250 - 350 degrees if post curing is completed.

    Another option is to just build a temporary curing oven. It's much easier than it sounds. You can use an electric heating element for the heat source (or two - three for larger ovens). The same kind people buy to build diy BBQ smokers. I am using the aluminum extrusions (that I decided not to use for my CNC build) for the frame with aluminum sheets and high temp insulation for the walls. Then you just need a temp controller and oven thermometer.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by jono5axe View Post
    Very interesting thread for me, as I am just about to build a 4000mm long composite gantry. I have been procrastinating back and forth about it, and maybe just to use steel, but am pretty committed by now to doing it in composite. I therefore list my plan below, for the purpose of getting everyones comments. All comments and ideas gratefully accepted - to ensure I am not overlooking something....

    - Composite gantry beam 4000mm long x 600mm high x 400mm deep [RHS - rectangular hollow section].
    - Construction: Sandwich construction - 5mm foam core, internal laminate = 2mm quadraxlial glass fibre, external laminate = 4mm quadraxial carbon fibre & glass fibre (50%/50%), with transverse internal gussets/bulkheads every 300mm (bonded in).
    - Resin system = epoxy, infusion, room temp.
    - Method: vacuum infusion + hotbox post cure cycle. [make up core material as C-Section, lay-up inside C-Section, bond in transverse gussets, close C-Section by bonding on last side panel, vacuum infuse external laminate in one hit].
    - Thermal expansion goal is to achieve approximate equivalence with concrete [13x10-6 m/(mK)] and steel [12x10-06 m/(mK)], as side frames are steel and machine base is concrete floor. Thermal expansion co-efficient of epoxy GRP = 36x10-06 m/(mK), epoxy/carbon = 2x10-06 m/(mK).

    Metal threads will be achieved by either/or
    1) 50x8mm steel flatbar laminated into the core of the sandwich construction, or,
    2) Drilling beam and bonding in threaded inserts (with plexus/crestabond/etc)

    Datum faces (machine beds) for 35mm linear rails & 24x24mm gear rack will be produced by one of the following methods, either/or:
    1) Shimming components in place and then back-filling gaps with "Chock-it" [CHOCKFAST ORANGE (PR-610TCF)], or,
    2) Epoxy-concrete machine beds, molded on a 4000mm long flat table produced with self-leveling epoxy (make flat table mold using self-leveling epoxy, lay in the epoxy/sand/fibre mix on the table mold, place the gantry beam on top to bond the epoxy concrete machine beds to the beam.

    ??? forgotten something?...

    Like I said, all comments and ideals thanks very much.

    Regards,
    Jono

    Sounds like we are following a similar path (just on a different scale). After researching until my brain melted and poured out of my ears, I also decided to go with an epoxy granite machine base for my CNC build. The first section is curing right now.

    I am copying this guy's basic design for my base:

    Casting Machine Bases in Composite Epoxy | Hackaday

    looking at your plan, one thing to think about is going to be your choice of resin. With the sizes you are talking about, heat curing is going to be difficult with most traditional heat cure epoxy resins but there could be issues with most room temp cure resins.

    Most of the lower cost hobby level resins have fairly low heat deflection temperatures. This is the temp they start to soften under load. Some are as low as 110 degrees F which is far from ideal for precision machine parts. This issue is most commonly addressed by using a quality resin and post curing at 250 or 350 degrees to raise the heat deflection temp.

    obviously it's going to be hard to fit 3000mm beams in the oven but there are a few good alternatives:

    I have recently started testing a new room temp epoxy called Adtech 820. It has a heat deflection temp of over 180 degrees with no post curing. It's more expensive than regular laminating resins but worth it for this.

    There is a low (ish) cost heat cure resin called "Max HTE" available on eBay. If curing ovens are not available for larger parts, the curing process can be completed using Ir heat lamps or even by leaving the parts outside on a sunny day. This resin has a deflection temp of 250 - 350 degrees if post curing is completed.

    Another option is to just build a temporary curing oven. It's much easier than it sounds. You can use an electric heating element for the heat source (or two - three for larger ovens). The same kind people buy to build diy BBQ smokers. I am using the aluminum extrusions (that I decided not to use for my CNC build) for the frame with aluminum sheets and high temp insulation for the walls. Then you just need a temp controller and oven thermometer.



  14. #54
    Member hanermo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    barcelona
    Posts
    780
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: My carbon fiber CNC gantry

    One can make a huge oven using plywood.
    Plywood resist high temps quite well.

    Upto 140+ C == 300 F has zero effect on wooden structures .. common in saunas lasting 30+ years.

    Boat guys make 30 m long ovens, from tarps over pvs, double skin, and they work fine, with heat losses but they are one-use structures.



  15. #55
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    926
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: My carbon fiber CNC gantry

    Quote Originally Posted by DermotMcD View Post
    We've been making carbon fibre gantries for some time… and just stopped.

    In our application, we had to make a 10 metre wide machine which would move at 1 metre/sec or faster and support a weight of 100 kgs with moderate accuracy. The flex and the torsion of the gantry had to be low. Yes, we're not talking about mill accuracy but adequate for the purpose, say ± 0.3mm.

    Carbon or aluminium were the choices with a monocoque carbon gantry seeming like a good choice compared with a fabricated aluminium one. The layup engineering was done by outside contractors with experience of masts and other high load carbon products.

    The gantry was made from pre-preg and nomex core. My experience is that pre-preg is fast and clean and offers much better integrity than resin infusion where you can quite easily get failures in the infusion process giving bubbles and delimitation.

    The mould was fairly immense and used a bladder to inflate to 3-4 atmospheres instead of vacuum bagging. The entire mould was fitted into a fabricated autoclave with heaters to get it up over 120ºC.

    After some months of use, it was obvious that there was some sag in the gantry so the next versions used a heavier and heavier layup. I can't be sure, but my guess is that sag is a fact of life unless you have a truly massively thick layup.

    In spite of the fairly substantial mould, there was some distortion in the finished product because of the pressure used in the bladder. Attaching parts is somewhat problematic since accurate location is difficult with the mould.

    The gantry is also noisy. Because it is hollow and fairly stiff, any vibration is amplified like beating a drum skin. Unless you add something like Kevlar, this is a fact of life with carbon.

    What made us stop this method of construction was mainly the space required for the mould and autoclave but also the noise and sagging. We decided that for our requirements, fast and light, that aluminium would be better. Note, that cost was not a decisive factor but there's no doubt that the alu version is going to be cheaper.

    For a CNC machine, honestly, I can't see the point. You normally don't need more speed than you can get from a lead screw because cutting tools won't really go very fast. You do need to damp vibration and carbon doesn't look great there. You will need some compression strength and carbon fails there too.

    There's no doubt that carbon is sexy as far as outward appearances go and in some applications where weight and strength are critical, carbon offers a lot but where weight is not a big issue, then metal looks more interesting and at a fraction of the cost and complexity.

    D

    It sounds like the outside engineers didn't do enough work on the design specs. Carbon fiber, steel, and aluminum can all be stiff and strong enough if the part is properly designed and enough material is used. They can also all be too weak and flexible if wall thickness is inadequate or the design is suboptimal etc.

    Personally, I wouldn't be relying on the typical process of laying fabric horizontally in a mold and attempting to achieve the desired stiffness by using enough layers or adding a filler material for the core with parts as large as you describe. It's not that it isn't possible to achieve the desired stiffness like that. It's just not efficient or cost effective imo.

    In my testing I have seen a 10x increase in strength and stiffness using the same amount of material by adding certain design features. The basic idea is that cf is least stiff when laid flat and stiffness increases dramatically when it is curved.

    The center of my gantry has two layers of thick wall carbon fiber tubes. Currently, six tubes run parallel to the rails on the gantry face plate and dozens of shorter tubes are mounted at 90 degrees and embedded in high temp resin. I also added carbon nanotubes to the resin so it is quite literally bullet-proof. Nanotubes apparently add 30% in stiffness. They certainly make a noticeable difference.

    If I was setting up a commercial cf gantry beam manufacturing processes, I would probably choose to use a filament winding process like Compotech for the efficiency and design flexibility. I think the winding process can be more easily optimized for maximum stiffness than using regular prewoven fabrics. I bet that hand laying woven prepreg into a mold that big took forever. A machine winding yarn or even prewoven prepreg around a mandrel lends itself to automation better.

    Anyone wanting to get an understanding of how to design cf parts for maximum stiffness should take three identical pieces of cf fabric wetted out with resin. Let one cure as a single flat layer. Cure the second curved half way around a tube. Roll the third into a full tube and let them all fully cure. The flat piece will easily bend or tear by hand. The curve will bend with far more difficulty. The tube won't bend by hand at all.



  16. #56
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    926
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: My carbon fiber CNC gantry

    Quote Originally Posted by hanermo View Post
    One can make a huge oven using plywood.
    Plywood resist high temps quite well.

    Upto 140+ C == 300 F has zero effect on wooden structures .. common in saunas lasting 30+ years.

    Boat guys make 30 m long ovens, from tarps over pvs, double skin, and they work fine, with heat losses but they are one-use structures.

    Does plywood burn? It kinda seams like it would be a fire hazard. It's not the oven temps that would bother me. It's the heating element being anywhere near wood that would scare me.

    I prefer my method of using aluminum sheet metal, extrusions and high temp insulation. It' just seems safer and more efficient.

    As an fyi, I have seen people use cement board for the oven walls. It's cheap like plywood and maybe a little safer for an oven build. I have read about people using old steel school lockers as their oven enclosure.

    Whatever is used, good high temp insulation is key. It will be harder and more expensive to maintain or reach 350 degrees with a small element if insulation is poor. Also, I hate it when the oven heats up the whole room and makes working near it unbearable. Or worse, where you need to use too many element and it constantly trips the breaker....

    High temp insulation is very cheap. I got 24" x 48" x 1" pieces off eBay for $6 and it's good up to 1200 degrees.

    For medium sized ovens ovens that require less than 48" of space, some BBQ smokers make perfectly adequate curing ovens as they come in larger sizes than regular semi-portable ovens. They are also designed to maintain a steady 250 degrees for long periods.



  17. #57
    Member jono5axe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    65
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: My carbon fiber CNC gantry

    Quote Originally Posted by Goemon View Post
    looking at your plan, one thing to think about is going to be your choice of resin. With the sizes you are talking about, heat curing is going to be difficult with most traditional heat cure epoxy resins but there could be issues with most room temp cure resins.

    Most of the lower cost hobby level resins have fairly low heat deflection temperatures. This is the temp they start to soften under load. Some are as low as 110 degrees F which is far from ideal for precision machine parts. This issue is most commonly addressed by using a quality resin and post curing at 250 or 350 degrees to raise the heat deflection temp.
    Resins.
    I do plan to use ambient temp resin, but was referring to POST-CURE process when I mentioned HOT-BOX, (as opposed to an oven). Any composite structure/part must be post cured to achieve stability and meet performance specification, even ambient temp resin systems. I would have to get my spec sheets out, but this would normally be a post cure (epoxy) at say 60-80 degrees Celsius for a number of hours. Failing to post cure is bad......

    Again, would have to check specs on particular products, but most ambient epoxy resin systems (I don't know about hobby, I am referring to commercially available, boatbuilding/marine/industrial/etc) are good up to 120 - 150 degrees Celsius before softening (glass transition temp). To restate the obvious, we are choosing epoxy because of it's high bond strength and especially it's low shrinkage properties, which we are hoping to give us cnc machine structures with dimensional stability and time stability. Hense the need for full cure cycles / post cure processes.

    obviously it's going to be hard to fit 3000mm beams in the oven but there are a few good alternatives:

    I have recently started testing a new room temp epoxy called Adtech 820. It has a heat deflection temp of over 180 degrees with no post curing. It's more expensive than regular laminating resins but worth it for this.

    There is a low (ish) cost heat cure resin called "Max HTE" available on eBay. If curing ovens are not available for larger parts, the curing process can be completed using Ir heat lamps or even by leaving the parts outside on a sunny day. This resin has a deflection temp of 250 - 350 degrees if post curing is completed.

    Another option is to just build a temporary curing oven. It's much easier than it sounds. You can use an electric heating element for the heat source (or two - three for larger ovens). The same kind people buy to build diy BBQ smokers. I am using the aluminum extrusions (that I decided not to use for my CNC build) for the frame with aluminum sheets and high temp insulation for the walls. Then you just need a temp controller and oven thermometer.
    Ovens, Hot-boxes.
    I own a composites manufacturing business and we build temp ovens (hot boxes) all the time. These may be as simple and small as a cardboard carton and a fan heater to cure a small polyester part or it many be a larger timber framed box for larger, odd shaped items. typically 50x50mm timber frame with 125micron plastic sheet stapled on the outside, 2mm eva/foam/foil sheet stapled on the inside (foil facing in) with the 50mm air gap in between. Single phase 2.4kW fan heaters (several) will get a hot box like this up to 60 degrees without much difficulty, if box is well made (without leaks). Use IR pistol thermometers to monitor temperatures all over the part surfaces and hot-boxes throughout the process. Make sure the part is in the top area of the hot-box, not sitting on the floor.....

    Obviously, best results from a structural performance viewpoint would be gained from using a temperature cure epoxy system and an autoclave, but I do not believe that this is necessary for building a cnc gantry beam, even quite large ones. Ambient cure and a hot-box should do the job, along with good (common sense) beam design..... for me, time will tell.


    Beam design.

    Regarding all the various comments/posts on here about carbonfibre gantry structures, I would like to point out that a beam is a beam is a beam (no matter what it is made of) and that good beam design does not get thrown out the window just because we are considering using carbonfibre. The process can possibly be demystified by designing a beam as normal and substituting the different (carbon, GRP) typical material data. Typical values are probably good enough (for each laminate orientation). Deflection values should be the focus. It is also important to remember that a gantry is a torsional member more that a bending beam...........especially for larger z-axis machines.

    Personally, I tend to think that there should be some glass fibre in the laminate for the purpose of:
    1) protecting the outer surface of the carbon from damage during operation (impact/wear/etc).
    2) additional laminate thickness, for damping/robustnest.
    3) less brittle structure (carbon is brittle, fails catastrophically)
    4) modifying thermal expansion co-efficient.
    other? maybe.

    Spiral winding? ...no.
    Structural part = structural material (biaxial, triaxial, quadraxial, unidirectional). Put the fibre orientation where it is needed (where the stress orientation is).

    Additional note: a part made and fully cured in a mold will be as straight as the moid, but a part made not in a mold will likely have some straightness deviation from fabrication and cure.


    Sounds like we are following a similar path (just on a different scale). After researching until my brain melted and poured out of my ears, I also decided to go with an epoxy granite machine base for my CNC build. The first section is curing right now.

    I am copying this guy's basic design for my base:

    Casting Machine Bases in Composite Epoxy | Hackaday

    My machine base is steel, only my gantry is (possibly) being made in composite. The main frames are welded steel RHS. The main horizontal side rails are 250x250x4000RHS bolted on (no welding here) and are filled with epoxy/aggregate mix, for stability. Gantry and Z-axis in composite (if I can get my #### together).

    Regards,
    Jono



  18. #58
    Member jono5axe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    65
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: My carbon fiber CNC gantry

    Goemon, I had another thought - re post-cure and epoxy agregates.

    My earlier comments on post-cure relate to laminates, and I am not so sure about the situation with epoxy/aggregate mixtures. I would expect the same to apply in general terms, but possibly to be less important as the quantity and mass of the aggregate fill is so great that it modifies the resin behaviour to an extent (shrinkage, geltime, cure, exotherm, etc). I would expect that post-cure would still be desirable for high tolerance machines, but possibly not very important otherwise. Mild elevated temperatures and time will achieve complete stability sooner or later.

    Jono



  19. #59
    Registered rocrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    6
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: My carbon fiber CNC gantry

    In the marine industry , a lot of high end manufacturers are going away from prepreg laminates to infusion and bagging with a low temp post cure for a lot of the high end stuff .
    With all the hybrid laminates ,the different weaves and the different modulus of carbon and the newer cross linked low temp set epoxies , there is no need to go with the extremely expensive components .
    There is also a drift away from Nomex cores to foam cores ,but they have increased in thickness from the old 20mm cores to 30-50mm cores that are triple knifed or kerfed.
    This triple kerf allows resin pass through in the core effectively tying both laminate skins together , so the laminate is in tension and compression ,make for a much stiffer laminate with less weight .
    This process was actually first use in aviation to produce composite wing structures that needed ultimate stiffness because of only being held at the root of the wing . I believe if you guys are looking for ultimate stiffness and lightness this would be the way forward .
    I would probably build a tapered rectangular mold and build two longitudinally tapered beams that I would bond together and then do a 3/4 wrap of biax or triax cloth on a +/- 45 or +/- 45 ,0 leaving the forward face where the linear rails are mounted free of further laminate . This should give you four vertical walls to handle sagging , two of which are on a diagonal which with take care of any rotational movement caused by the spindle wanting to push the gantry up and rotating backwards .Perhaps the first laminate in the mold could be either E glass or Kevlar for impact resistance and the rest carbon . A standard modulus should be fine , but if you want to spend a bunch more and save a little more weight a hybrid or high modulus carbon would be better .
    I would probably go with a mechanically and bonded fastening of the posts which could be fabricated in metal of choice , this would help to dampen any vibration up into the gantry from the pinion gear running on the rack .

    On the beam laminate , remember if you are wanting to safely thread fasteners into carbon the minimum thickness of the laminate needs to be 2D or two times the diameter of the fastener and it should be into a solid laminate area without any core materials . These areas can have additional patching or layers of laminate to build up to the required thickness , but the laminate should taper into the cored area to avoid any hard spotting or abrupt changing load paths otherwise a load can produce a catastrophic failure of the laminate in the area .
    Any fastening into carbon should be isolated with either a compound or a threaded insert which is mechanically and chemically bonded .
    Tefgel can be used or even 3M 4200 can be used for this process . For mechanical isolation , rivnuts or weldmounts are best here and both are usually bonded with a methacrylate or acrylic glue , the same used to bond the wing structure to the wing spare in military jets .
    I think along with the brain trust on this forum and some help from some form of FEA software like Solidworks , a suitable structure can easily be achieved .
    Keep up the idea flow and remember there are no bad suggestions , a less then satisfactory suggestion for the application can lead to a good one .

    Roc



  20. #60
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3920
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: My carbon fiber CNC gantry

    Hi Roc;

    This statement: "With all the hybrid laminates ,the different weaves and the different modulus of carbon and the newer cross linked low temp set epoxies , there is no need to go with the extremely expensive components ." is perhaps the thing that inspires the most questions in your post. For those of use not familiar at all with these techniques we have no idea where to get thee new materials, For example "newer cross linked low temp set epoxies". The "newer" is a big question as I know where to get epoxies for wood working such as System 3 but I have no idea if that is the type of epoxy you are talking about.

    Basically many of the industry sites online are confusing as they either over simply or just leave out details. Hoping for some informed pointers here to advance my research into these processes.



Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


About CNCzone.com

    We are the largest and most active discussion forum for manufacturing industry. The site is 100% free to join and use, so join today!

Follow us on


Our Brands

My carbon fiber CNC gantry

My carbon fiber CNC gantry