![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| Digitizing and Laser Digitizing Discuss Digitizing parts via Laser or otherwise here! |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
I just bought a small cnc mill to try light production work. I have been a machinist for about 15 years and I am realizing this cnc stuff is an entirely different world. G code is currently voodoo to me. I am wondering if this little TP100 probe might help me get off of top dead center. I have prototypes I've cast out of plastic but I run into walls everywhere I turn when I take the dimensions and try to plot them on the computer. I just don't know enough about cad/cam yet. My machine is a three HP, 3 axis machine with ballscrews and reliance servo motors. My software is Bobcad version 19 and Mach 2 on a slow Windows XP machine. I realize practice makes perfect but I really can't wait 6 months to learn g code and start production. So if anyone has advice on this probe or maybe the Renishaw MP11 or similar devices, I would appreciate the help. While I'm thinking about it, do I need a 4th axis for a digitizer to make a complete 3D schematic of my parts? I am making parts that are roughly 6 inches by 4 inches by 2 inches or smaller out of mild steel, aluminum or plastic. Recommendations on cnc books for beginers might be nice too! Thanks for any and all help, Rick |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
__________________ It's just a part..... cutter still goes round and round.... |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Rick, you've bitten off quite a chunk. I don't know what a TP100 probe is, but digitizing on your CNC mill might be more complicated than learning your CAD/CAM. Here are the issues as I understand them. If anyone has better information, please speak up. When you digitize with the CNC, you need a program to move the probe around and take the point readings. I am not sure exactly where you would get this program. The result from the digitizing is a text file that contains X,Y,Z locations for thousands of points on the model. You can set up how small you want the point grid. A smaller (tighter) grid is more accurate, but increases your file size and time expontentially. So let's say that you are able to get the point cloud data. Now this has to be turned into a solid model or surfaced model so Bobcad can apply tool path to it. This is a difficult job in itself. You may want to post some pictures of your models so we can respond better about the 4th axis work. If you are doing full 3D sculptures then maybe, but otherwise you can get by with some indexing fixtures. Just think about it like you would machine it manually, the CNC just replaces you cranking on the handles. If you have a 4 axis mill, then a 4 axis digitizer would be appropriate, otherwise its probably not needed. Kind of long winded, but here's some suggestions. Work through the tutorials with Bobcad. That won't take too long. You have to build your skills up on easier projects and then work your way up to the hard stuff. Kind of like a machine shop apprenticeship. I doubt if your first project was to make an injection mold. Probably, just cut off some stock and square it up. You have to build up your CNC skills the same way. You are way ahead of the curve with a machining background. The CNC part is relatively easy after that. |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
Definition: The point at which the piston reaches the top of its travel on the compression stroke. In urban slang, it means "No power, I don't know what to do to get moving on a project and am stuck" I guess this shows our relative ages |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| Hi there, I don't have a probe (yet), but I've always looked at it as something to add on to my machine once I knew how to use it properly. Would you not be better off trying to learn CAD/CAM properly now, rather than trying to avoid it? I had no experince with CAD and I managed to teach myself the basics in a few days just by using the help files and some simple tutorials. After a bit more practice, I was able to do more complex objects. BTW, if your 3hp mill is 'small', then I'm not sure what mine would be classed as... Regards Warren
__________________ Have a nice day... |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| I don't think a probe will really do what you want it to. The probe will only give you X, Y and Z coordinates of points you take. You would still have to creat the g-code for the part. A couple of options..... 1. Find some online references for g-code, and study the heck out of it. I'm sure you can find something, but it may be hard to find something that explains from very basic to moderately complexity. This board is a great start though. 2. Find someone to do your g-code for you, until you can figure it out. After seeing a couple of parts done, you should be able to decifer it with the information you find online. Then learn from there. I happen to do such work (shameless plug). Reverse engineering, modeling from scratch, programming, etc are some of the things I have done. 3. Find some simple programms either here, or from doing an online search, that explains line by line what the code does. Again, I'm not familiar with any such places, but this board would be a great start. I would think throwing a couple programs together to do simple stuff (squares, circles, simple parts with steps, etc) would be kind of fun for most people here. 4. Ask, ask, ask. Everyone here is great with helping those that need help. If you find something that you don't exactly understand, post here and you'll get more than enough help.
__________________ Dustin B. ================ I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Buscht.... hell, I would've figured "BDC" to be used like that. Thanks for the info though. I agree with with DAB, digitizing with a probe on a machine can be done. But to go as far as reverse engineering an entire part in full 3D will take some serious programming. If you need this to be flexible (the probe on the cnc), it will take even more serious programming. You'd be better off mechanically reversing the part for geometry until you get to that point. Or, looking into actual digitizing equipment to render in 3D. Pricey though...
__________________ It's just a part..... cutter still goes round and round.... |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Thanks Buscht, I guess I have a habit of dating myself. I am just an old gear head. Well gang, if I were not intimidated by this before, I am now. I will try to take some digital pics, but I am essentially making American rifle parts for imported rifles. It is pretty much a niche market. You have to be able to make a few of these and several of those, but not a whole lot of anything. Clear as mud, I know. My buddy is the idea man and I'm the labor, so I'm not sure I understand the market either. Most of these parts are small, nothing larger than, say, 6x4x2 inches. Some would be as small as 1.5x.5x.5 inches. I am just prototyping right now, but I am trying to figure out the most efficient way to turn them into 3d files/g code/tool path/ finished product without having to manually cut each one. I did talk with Fred Smith about his DeskCNCsoftware and the TP100 probe. Fred is great to talk to and his equipment sounds like it might solve some of my problems. However, it does sound like I may be in a little over my head until get used to the cnc part. Sheesh, I think I'll go eat supper, scratch my head some more and see if I can revise my game plan. I might have bitten off more than I can chew. Rick |
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
The DeskCNC output, .STL file, is filtered for spikes, smoothed to remove the stairstep effects from a digital measurement process, and reverse compensated for the probe tip radius to produce a smooth surface model, the same size as the original scan. DeskCNC also includes 3D toolpath creation (CAM) to directly machine the scanned model. This process produces very good results for parts that have a decorative or artistic function. rifle stocks, hand rests, grips, packing nests, statuary and sculptures are examples of common applications for surface scanning. For producing strictly mechanical components, it is better to draw the part details using traditional wireframe or 3D modeling Cad. A reamed or tapped hole is not a good candidate for surface scanning. Fred Smith - IMService http://www.cadcamcadcam.com/hobby |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#11
| ||||
| ||||
I have a 4 axis router running MACH2 and a Xylotex board. If your probe would run on my system with easy to use software, I'm ready to purchase today! (or maybe tomorrow, once I get approval from the wife) Thanks Trent |
|
#12
| |||||
| |||||
DeskCNC-in-a-box Fred Smith - IMService http://www.cadcamcadcam.com/hobby |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Z axis touch probe | Swede | FlashCut CNC | 7 | 08-29-2007 01:09 PM |
| Touch Probe Amplifier Modifications | itsme | General Electronics Discussion | 8 | 06-07-2005 09:57 AM |
| CNC noob needs a machine | bootdc | CNC Wood Router Project Log | 7 | 05-18-2005 06:35 PM |
| Pop-up tool touch probe | dmealer | General Metal Working Machines | 4 | 04-04-2005 07:47 AM |
| homemade 3D touch probe? | cnczane | DIY-CNC Router Table Machines | 26 | 06-26-2004 08:17 AM |