CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > WoodWorking Machines > DIY-CNC Router Table Machines > CNC Wood Router Project Log


CNC Wood Router Project Log Post your CNC machine building log here only.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 02-19-2006, 01:45 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ENGLAND
Age: 47
Posts: 1,655
Oldmanandhistoy is on a distinguished road
3rd CNC ROUTER BUILD time to get serious.

Well I’ve made a start on my third build. I have plans to build a CNC wood router which will be use to cut Plywood, MDF and Plastics; defiantly NO Aluminium. Cutting area of around 850mm X, 850mm Y and 75mm Z.

This will be used in a light commercial environment. It is not going to be used 8hrs per day and 5day a week; More likely 10 hrs a week.

Basically I’m not going to use commercial available linear ways or ball screws. As I feel these would be an unnecessary extravagance for a wood router working to a tolerance of +/- 0.1mm and this will only be really utilised for plastics.

First question, will it be ok for me to talk in millimetres? For now I will continue and hope this is ok as I am likely to make mistakes with conversions.

I’m looking for cutting speeds of around 1000mm to 2000mm/Min

Rapid speeds to be worked out, any recommendations?

Obviously I could go out and buy a second hand machine but to be absolutely honest I would rather build and also I don’t have a bottomless pocket. Having built two other machines I now have the bug big time and see this as a recreation rather than a chore.

Now you’re all probably thinking Aluminium but no. I am planning being a wood man to build using a hardwood multiply reinforced with steel where needed.

Before you all go to avoid boredom I will add a picture. This is my Y axis test set up. Basically it is two pipes with a torsion box from 12mm ply and skinned with hard board. I will not be using this in my machine it is for test purposes only and will be scrapped after testing. The torsion box was cut using my other small cnc router. You may be able to see my bearing arrangement I will elaborate soon on these.

More to follow.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Yaxistest.jpg‎
Views:	367
Size:	70.1 KB
ID:	14841  
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 02-19-2006, 02:25 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ENGLAND
Age: 47
Posts: 1,655
Oldmanandhistoy is on a distinguished road

Let me explain my self when I say “time to get serious”.

My first build was primarily a MDF construction which I used to learn the basics. This machine was scraped after cutting parts for my second. The second cnc router was made using multiply, pipe, skate bearings and draw slides for my Z axis. I am still using my second. This has a working area of 350mm x 610mm x 50mm.

I designed and built this router with information I got from this excellent forum.
Now I want a more serious machine to work in my cabinet shop. Not being an engineer I would like some help with the design process. So where better than here. I would like to build a machine that is as efficient as possible.
When I said no commercial linear ways I should of add only in the Z axis and these will be 12mm round rail with linear bearings to suit.
The X and Y will probably be drill rod and skate bearings (because I have experience with these and like the set up. This may change as I go along but probably not.

Where I really need help will be with working out cutting forces and the like so I can add reinforcement using steel where necessary.

For instant I would like to turn my Y axis test set up on its side and add weight to represent cutting force and measure the flex and twist adding steel where necessary to counteract the effect..

Now how do I work out the weight to be used? I have worked out that the heaviest cut I will make will be 12mm wide by 6mm deep using a TCT cutter with two flutes in plywood at 2000mm/min hopefully.

Can anyone help me with working this out or knows of a site with information I need?
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 02-19-2006, 07:07 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ENGLAND
Age: 47
Posts: 1,655
Oldmanandhistoy is on a distinguished road

I’ve done a Google and been unable to find the information I need where cutting forces are concerned.

So now I’m thinking I may need to set up my test Y axis with an X axis and do some pulley and weight tests.

How I would do the tests.

With a pulley and weight attached to the y axis calculate as near as I can the weight needed to move the Y axis 1 meter in 30 seconds.

Then fix a router with the depth set to my 12mm wide and 6mm deep and drag this through ply at 1 meter / 30 seconds.

Subtract the first weight from the second and that would give me the weight to test my Y axis turned horizontal.

Questions.

Does this sound like a good method to calculate my cutting forces?

How do you other builders calculate how strong or how light you need your build to be?

John
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 02-19-2006, 07:55 PM
ger21's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Shelby Twp, MI....USA
Posts: 20,446
ger21 is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

Originally Posted by Oldmanandhistoy
Now how do I work out the weight to be used? I have worked out that the heaviest cut I will make will be 12mm wide by 6mm deep using a TCT cutter with two flutes in plywood at 2000mm/min hopefully.
The force required is dependant on tooling type and sharpness, and spindle speed. It also depends on the material, as there are different types of plywood.

On our commercial router, we use spiral chipbreaker tooling to cut plywood. It cuts faster and quieter than regular spirals, and much faster than straight bits. We do on occasion, though, use carbide insert tooling, but cut much slower than with spirals, about 3000mm/min.

From my experience, and from what I've read in the past, you'll probably be looking at between 10-30lbs force. I'd design for 30-50lbs, personally.


While I'm currently finishing my first homebuilt router, I also have plans for a much faster machine, and also made of wood. Instead of using solid hardwood, though, I plan on gluing up laminated beams, probably with epoxy, to get a bit more stability and strength vs solid hardwood.

One area of concern I noticed on my router, is the connection of the gantry beam to the gantry sides. This can be a very weak point on a wooden router.
__________________
Gerry

Mach3 2010 Screenset
http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 02-19-2006, 08:24 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ENGLAND
Age: 47
Posts: 1,655
Oldmanandhistoy is on a distinguished road

Thanks ger21

Nice to have your input as I know you have a large amount of cnc knowledge.

Just because I like to understand things could I ask you how, where you got the information; did you do your own testing?

I plan to add steel section which will be 16mm x 3mm to the torsion box and epoxy them into place.
Adding as many as necessary to prevent flex and twist.

What are your thoughts on that idea?

I will add a picture tomorrow of my design if it makes things clearer.

John
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6  
Old 02-19-2006, 10:56 PM
spalm's Avatar
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 578
spalm is on a distinguished road

Hey Old Man, (I always wanted to say that)

Looks good. I don’t have any numbers for you, but I have built a Y set up very close to what I see. (I would like to see a close up of your bearings) The suggestions I have so far are two things.

Gerry mentioned the first: a good connection of the Y beam to the gantry walls. Maybe mortise a rectangle in the gantry to receive the beam or extend the back side of the beam through the gantry walls. Looks like you did a sandwich for the pipe support rather than a torsion box. Seems to me this is sufficient. I don’t think flex here will cause you any problems. I spent a weekend trying to dovetail my beam into the gantry with frustrating results. Anyway, give this some thought.

The second is the probable tilt of the wrap-around Y carriage. I don’t know what your bearing setup is but both Gerry and I saw some of this. Try to keep the Z as close to the beam as possible should help.

I tested my carriage with a 30 pound motor clamped to the front and a metal ruler clamped to the carriage that just skimmed the cutting surface, By just pushing the carriage back and forth I could see the gap and make any design changes.

Steve
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 02-20-2006, 12:54 AM
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Age: 38
Posts: 36
whirlybomber is on a distinguished road

could I trouble you for some close-up views of your bearing mountings?

cheers,
Brad
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 02-20-2006, 06:46 AM
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ENGLAND
Age: 47
Posts: 1,655
Oldmanandhistoy is on a distinguished road

Hi spalm

Lol @ “hey old man”

So do you guys think if I mortise the beam into the gantry sides it would eliminate the problem?
If necessary I could also add a couple of bolts either side through the gantry wall and into the beam. Would this be over kill?

I am trying to keep the weight of my Y axis as low as possible for all the obviously reasons. I’m trying to think like a model aircraft designer would think. Only add weight if absolutely necessary to increase strength.

Thanks for you tip on testing, but I am more interested in the horizontal forced which would cause the beam to bend and twist. I probably should of said bend and bend as it is the fact that the top of the beam would bend one way and the bottom the opposite.
Having said that, I would be interested to know the forces necessary for plunging.

I also understand the cantilever forces on the Z axis and always try to keep the Z axis as close as possible to the Y. My first machine actually had the Z axis screw behind the Y axis screw. Although this is ideal it did restrict my Z axis movement. But it would be an ideal approach for others building a small machine say for milling PCB’s.

The weight needed to test this I would say would be critical to the whole machine as it will affect every component in all 3 axes.

I know it is impossible to give an accurate figure as it will depend on large number of different factors and my proposed method of testing would only get me so close because of the acceleration factors and the like. I need to give this serious thought before I proceed.

I have added a couple of photo of the bearing arrangement. Hopefully this will show you how I do this. I use this method in the router I am using at present and it works very well for me. The first picture shows the bearing set at 120 degrees and this is how I did my small router. The part you see is for a cnc router I am building for a friend.

The second picture shows the arrangement I might be using on this build.
Please feel free to pick this idea to bits if you see fit.
.
If this does not make things clear or you would like more info let me know and I will elaborate more.

John.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	MLNA0003.JPG‎
Views:	257
Size:	36.4 KB
ID:	14859   Click image for larger version

Name:	MLNA0002.JPG‎
Views:	341
Size:	46.8 KB
ID:	14860  

Last edited by Oldmanandhistoy; 03-04-2006 at 07:30 PM.
Reply With Quote

  #9  
Old 02-20-2006, 10:40 AM
ger21's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Shelby Twp, MI....USA
Posts: 20,446
ger21 is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

Originally Posted by Oldmanandhistoy
Just because I like to understand things could I ask you how, where you got the information; did you do your own testing?
I read it on one of the Yahoo groups, I believe someone did some testing using a fish scale, or something similar.
__________________
Gerry

Mach3 2010 Screenset
http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Reply With Quote

  #10  
Old 02-20-2006, 10:43 AM
ger21's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Shelby Twp, MI....USA
Posts: 20,446
ger21 is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

Originally Posted by Oldmanandhistoy
So do you guys think if I mortise the beam into the gantry sides it would eliminate the problem?

I don't think the mortise would help that much at all. The beam acts like a large lever, which can put a lot of force from one side to the other. If you're driving the gantry with 2 screws, it won't really be a problem. What I'd recommend is to use some 1/4" aluminum angle, or 1/8" steel, maybe 2"x2", on each side of the beam to attach it to the sides. This will spread the load over a much larger area.
__________________
Gerry

Mach3 2010 Screenset
http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #11   Ban this user!
Old 02-20-2006, 01:18 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ENGLAND
Age: 47
Posts: 1,655
Oldmanandhistoy is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by ger21
I don't think the mortise would help that much at all. The beam acts like a large lever, which can put a lot of force from one side to the other. If you're driving the gantry with 2 screws, it won't really be a problem. What I'd recommend is to use some 1/4" aluminum angle, or 1/8" steel, maybe 2"x2", on each side of the beam to attach it to the sides. This will spread the load over a much larger area.
I have been planning on using two screws on the X axis but see your points.

I know I may have got away with one in the centre but I also know I will end up building a larger router in the future so the two screw method will be good practice and I believe a better method even on a small machine like this.

Another thing I would like others to ponder on is; how I will build my X axis rails.
I have been thinking of using two Y axis assemblies turned horizontal. So that would be four rails and six bearings per rail. I believe horizontal forces will be reduced to manageable levels but am concerned about the rails sagging over time.

Your thoughts would be very much appreciated. Maybe I should think about using them vertically instead?
Reply With Quote

  #12   Ban this user!
Old 02-20-2006, 01:35 PM
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 313
WhiteTiger is on a distinguished road

I'd go vertical, personally. The static vertical weight load is forever but the lateral cutting and inertial forces are relatively minor and only when the machine is cutting. Imo, of course



Tiger
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361