![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| CNC Plasma and Waterjet Machines Discuss building, operating CNC Plasma, waterjet and EDM machines here! |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Best 4 x 8 Plasma Table - Opinions Needed Im ready to purchase a plasma table budget between 20-30k. Am I better off purchasing a used industrial machine like a MG or ESAB or a brand new such as a dynatorch. I Currently outsource 50K+ a year in laser cutting and feel I if bring it in house via plasma for a significant cost savings and better lead times. I only run 1 shift and most material we plan to cut is 1/4"-1/2". usage would be abotu 40 hours per week. Is it worth upgrading to high-def plasma unit such as an inner logic or hypertherm? I look forward to any opinions |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Laser versus plasma. Laser cleanup is nearly zero while plasma can involve considerable cleanup. Please take this into consideration. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| It must of been my laser cutter because I had to clean up my parts all the time |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| I don't know what kind of cutting you're gonna do, but In my opinion... Plasma is not the ideal method for cutting "parts" I mean, artsy stuff like signs and things where tolerance is not an issue are great. But I do alot of cutting for vehicles where the tolerance has to be a consideration and I hate it. I'd much rather cut the artsy stuff that has more forgiveness that the parts I cut. I feel I can't compete with the laser and Hi-def guys. I've been looking at the Hi-Def plasma cutting systems and the difference in cut quality is huge.... of course so is the difference in price... for me anyways. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Well the quotes I got for a 100-200 amp high def unit is about $25k and when you can a table for 10k, 35k for a high def setup inst bad |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Yeah that's about the price I got too, but to me... it's a bit too high right now. |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| Scratch, you hit the nail on the head on high def v. reg plasma. Even with a fine tuned plasma compared to high defintion the prep work required is rather large. Time = $$$ And as Howitt mentions the high def is > $$$ The accuracy of your table is very important too. I would not even consider high def on my 6 y/o Torchmate. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Ive consider building servo / ballscrew table my self running mach 3 with the innerlogic setup. I would have between 35-40k in that setup. |
|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
| Innerlogic power source combined with the Dynatorch controls would make a nice match. I have the Hypertherm 1650 and it'll cut like crazy but is definitely nothing when compared to high-def. I believe fiber optic controls would be required due to the RF issues that come with the higher amperage machines. I recall that Innerlogic and or Hypertherm are rather picky about the table on which there high-def equipment will be paired, i.e. the tolerances that the table can hold or not hold are directly related to cut quality. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Also I've heard that with the Hi-def torches, you need a table that has two drive motors for the bridge, one on each side, or you will see every gear movement in the cut. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| howitt, take a look at Torch Mates web site. On their home page under Editorials > About Machine Accuracy > EXPLODING THE MACHINE ACCURACY MYTH. Was a pretty good little article to read. Here is a direct link http://www.torchmate.com/accuracy/index.htm |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |