![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| CamSoft Products Discuss Camsoft PC based CNC controller products here! |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Is there anyone who has actually done a retrofit using Camsoft with steppers? I have a Series II Bridgeport that I have been struggling with for a year. Thanks in advance
__________________ Thanks Marc |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Marc, What are the issues you are having a problem with? Detail some specifics, some of us may be able to help. Al
__________________ “Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.” Albert E. (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Hello Marc, Where are you in the country? I may be able to help you. I have helped my customer set up a stepper machine before. It's much different than the servos I have used with CamSoft. It turned out okay and almost have to say it was easier. Bridgeports should be nothing special with CamSoft. They showed me a Bridgeport clone running. The man told me it runs much better now with the PC control. I am not sure I can help but I will try. Bob |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| I sure appreciate the responses. Bob, we are just north of Ft Lauderdale FL. Sure, there is no reason that just because it’s a Bridgeport there should be any problem. I had the machine running OK, although there were some unresolved issues that I had put aside till later. I won’t go into the reasons just now, but I replaced the 3 stepper boards with new drives. The new drives are losing steps (well I assume they are losing steps, the machine is losing position). Here is what I know: Opto isolated inputs, require 5 v @ 7ma The Gallil motion card supplies 5V , up to 30ma The manufacturer of the drives has been very helpful, but we can’t find the problem. A scope confirms that there is a pretty clean 5v square wave from the card. We are talking feed rates of 1 IPM are a problem, so it’s not speed related. Separate issue, now that I have a scope on it I see there is a problem with the implementation of ramp up/down on the step pulses while using the handwheel for incremental jogging. The second issue is minor, as we are dead in the water because of the first.
__________________ Thanks Marc |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| Hi Marc, So you know you can redefine the acc/dec ramps whenever you need to, right? That is to say, you're not permanently stuck with the settings that you made in the setup page. Although I haven't played with any handwheel logic yet, I can imagine that there would be a special balance to be achieved, if you don't use decelstop in the handwheel logic. I'm not saying that you'd want to use it except when you exit handwheel mode, but in the same vein, more conservative (or more aggressive) acc/dec settings might be required (with or without DECELSTOP) whle in handwheel mode, just to prevent drive faults. In a servo system, you might get drive faults, in a stepper system without feedback, I suppose you'd just lose steps.
__________________ First you get good, then you get fast. Then grouchiness sets in. (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) Last edited by HuFlungDung; 06-18-2004 at 01:06 AM. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Hi Hu, Ok, here is what I know about the handwheel, and steppers in general. Am I correct when I say that all start/finish of movement on a stepper requires a ramp up/down of the pulse train to avoid losing steps, unless a very low speed is involved If OK2STOP is enabled, accell/decell is applied at the beginning and end of the travel. But the motor decels as soon as you stop turning the handwheel, so you cannot jog a specific distance Without OK2STOP each clcik represents a certain movement Here is the problem, the acell is only applied to the first movement, if you click again there is no ramp Well actually it depends on how fast you click again, I have the ramps set to be very long so I can observe them, and what happens is that the ramp up starts on the first click, and if the second click is soon enough it will still be ramping up, takes over where the previous click stopped. Am I making sense? I think this is a problem
__________________ Thanks Marc |
|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
| Marc, Have you tried a normal short Accel and a longer Decel? I would suspect that this could be where there could be a bottleneck in what is going out to the motor. Using a long Decel ramp might allow a smoother overlap between clicks.
__________________ First you get good, then you get fast. Then grouchiness sets in. (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Marc, You may be suffering a loss of torque due to microstepping. The original motors required 8+ amps in fullstep, I do not know what the microstep amps should be. I see you said it is a series II that means originaly 2000 counts=1" or 1 count=.0005" You will probably have to reduce your RAPIDSPEED setting to a speed your stepper can start at for handwheel operation. Darek |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |