![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| Bridgeport and Hardinge Mills Discuss Bridgeport and Hardinge Mills here! |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Hi All, When machining a part, my machine pauses for ~1 second after each linear movement and then starts again. Does anyone know what the cause is and if it could be corrected? I have attached a picture showing two cases, first where the movement is smooth and second where the machine pauses between linear paths. I have a TNC 2500 on the machine. Pali |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| bigbaz, I know that adding radius at the end of each linear path would make the operation smooth but I am hoping that there is a way to achieve continues motion with straight linear paths. I machine many parts with pockets that are entirely linear paths at multiple DOC so the pause time adds up significantly. Pali |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
first, if you are using 1 axis moves[X 3.00 F100 etc] rather than interpolations[L x3.00 etc] don't. If that isn't it, is there a parameter for positive stop at corners ? Also, slow accel parameters can make it appear to stop, when it actually isn't it is just ramping for a long time. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Agreed. But... I use CAM to generate the code as these are complex parts. It would not be efficient to add curves to programs that contain 2000+ lines. Just imagine a rectangle pocket that has 10 tool steps at 5 different DOCs. This means that I would have to add 10 x 4 x 5 = 200 curves. Even if I was able to add the radius at each of these locations, I would end up consuming so much more memory for the program. I can understand if there is no way to achieve continuous motion for linear movements with the setup on my machine but I don't know if this is the case. I guess my question should be if it is possible to eliminate the pause for linear movements via parameters or tunning? I appreciate your help bigbaz. Regards, Pali |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Gus, I just noticed your post after replying to bigbaz's comments. I am not using single axis movements, see code below. Smooth Movements with the following code: 14 L Y-1.3100 15 CC X+1.9710 Y-1.3100 16 C X+1.9710 Y-1.6325 DR- 17 L X+.1250 18 CC X+.1250 Y-1.3100 19 C X-0.1975 Y-1.3100 DR- 20 L Y-0.1250 21 CC X+.1250 Y-0.1250 22 C X+.1250 Y+.1975 DR- 23 L X+1.9710 24 CC X+1.9710 Y+.2475 Jerky Movements with the following code: 9 L X+.9007 F+220 10 L Y-0.8332 11 L X+1.1953 12 L Y-0.6019 13 L Y-0.4144 14 L X+.7132 Y-0.4143 15 L Y-1.0207 16 L X+1.3828 17 L Y-0.4145 18 L X+1.1953 Y-0.4144 19 L Z+.0500 20 L X+3.6953 Y-0.6019 I will check the parameters descriptions to see if there are options for positive stop and slow accel. Regards, Pali |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
set it to 90 and see if it helps. careful with rapids, you may get gross positioning errors as it tries to remain constant at a rapid feed. Otherwise it won't give you any trouble. accel parameters are in MM/min IIRC also you don't need all that cc bs, RND will do the trick |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| No Movement | wishmasterg | Mach Mill | 3 | 02-14-2007 06:39 PM |
| Fadal has been jerky and just cut in wrong area | chipsahoy | Fadal | 3 | 01-15-2007 02:23 PM |
| Jerky Z axis???? | bill south | Benchtop Machines | 7 | 09-10-2006 09:33 AM |
| Bridges & jerky movements. | Moondog | Machines running Mach Software | 20 | 07-29-2006 10:28 PM |
| jerky toolpath from rhino model | senor J. | Rhino 3D | 3 | 02-07-2005 05:36 PM |