EZ TRAK PLUS cable RS232c

[grzeniua]

As in the subject.. Do you have a schematic or just can explain how should I build up a cable for Bridgeport's EZ TRAK PLUS control unit with RS232c interface? It's not described in maual (greetings to machintek).

I found some description searching the forum (see attached pic) but I think it's wrong (looking at RS232 specification....)

As usual, I'd appreciate any feedback!
Greg

[One of Many]

I created that schematic about 6 years ago, you have posted there. My control is the predescessor to the Plus version. So, without a doubt it is correct for my machine. I am using EZ-link with no troubles. IIRC the pins with jumpers are a standard protocol for com ports without a handshake. These jumpers would set each port ready for transmit or recieve. Athough the 25pin on the EZ-trak control may not use 5&20, I have used this cable suscessfully for other RS-232 capable equipment.

You could verify what your 25pin configuration is. If it does not work the first try, you could swap pins 2&3 at one end of the cable. I removed the cover from the control to get the information I needed to create my cable.

I purchased the ends with hood shields and cable through Jameco, but they should be available locally at an electronics supplier near you. Surplus cables can be reconfigured if the ends are not molded on. Remove the case, locate and resolder the ends to reflect the schematic and try it out.

DC

[grzeniua]

For sure I'm going to try! Sorry for my doubts, but if you take a look for instance at this specification http://www.science.uva.nl/museum/rs232c.html you'll find out that:
#1 on your schematic pins 7 from DB9 & DB25 are connected, but for DB9 it means RTS (Request To Send) and for DB25 it means Signal GND. To me pin5 from DB9 should be joined to pin7 of DB25 (to get common GND)...
#2 why on DB9 pin4 (DTR - Data Terminal Ready) is in short circuit with pin5 (signal GND).
Those consideration put me in doubts... Could you verify that? Is it really in accordance with your cable?

Second thing is related to the supplier. I'm located in Poland, Europe, and believe me - it's not available here and that is the reason why I'm going to build it up by myself.

As you wrote about the "predecessor to the Plus version", I understood that you own EZ TRAK (w/o PLUS) control. If so, please send me an example of program cuz I'm not sure how this should look like! Is it something like that for instance:
0000 EZTRAK|3X 1 MODE|MM |NO COMP 07 01:07:12 1996
0002 AUXFUN T1 M6
0004 LINE ABS X0.0 Y30.18 Z0.0 F50.0
0006 ARC|CNTRPT ABS CW X55.0 Y50.38 Z0.0 XC55.0 YC-34.62 F50.0
0008 LINE ABS X55.0 Y30.0 Z0.0 F50.0
0010 RAPID ABS X0.0 Y0.0 Z0.0 F70.0
0012 AUXFUN T1 M2
or it's wrong and EZ-LINK (or control unit) would not "undertand" it well???

I'd appreciate any reply, thanks
Greg, grzeniua@wp.pl

[One of Many]

Greg,

I don't blame you for being reserved, since this cable is not a typical off the shelf item. I can appreciate that. As I have stated before in other posts on this topic. I think BP or SouthWest Industries(the OEM of this control, AKA ProtoTrak) used this cable configuration as one of those "High dollar" items only they could supply you. It is a lot less complex than the full standard RS232.

I do not know where or how that program you have posted was created from. It does not look like what I am familiar with. I do not know if the file format between the first generation EZ-Trak and the Plus version was that far different. Someone else would need to confirm that.

Here are 2 equivalent files of the included drawing. This drawing was used as a test to create a post processor that would work with my mill. The tool 1 cutter diameter in both was set to .375. Tool 2 are 2 rapid moves with a drill for the 2 holes.

Although the format is quite different, both run nearly identical.

My files must have the .TXT extention and be of a number. As in these examples, 222.txt or 2222.txt. Take note that both end with the % symbol as a marker to the end of file.

Hope this helps.

DC





The PN222 is done directly on the control to see what the output file generated.

PN222 G20;
N001 G101 XB0A YB0A XE0.5A YE1.0A TC1 F99.9 D0.375 CR0 T01 ;
N002 G101 XB0I YB0I XE4.0A YE1.0A TC1 F5.0 D0.375 CR0 T01 ;
N003 G101 XB0I YB0I XE4.0A YE2.0A TC1 F5.0 D0.375 CR0 T01 ;
N004 G101 XB0I YB0I XE3.375A YE2.0A TC1 F5.0 D0.375 CR0 T01 ;
N005 G102 XB0I YB0I XE3.0A YE2.375A XC3.375A YC2.375A F5.0 TC1 D0.375 CR0 T01 ;
N006 G101 XB0I YB0I XE3.0A YE2.625A TC1 F5.0 D0.375 CR0 T01 ;
N007 G103 XB0I YB0I XE2.625A YE3.0A XC2.625A YC2.625A F5.0 TC1 D0.375 CR0 T01 ;
N008 G101 XB0I YB0I XE1.0A YE3.0A TC1 F5.0 D0.375 CR0 T01 ;
N009 G101 XB0I YB0I XE1.0A YE0.625A TC1 F5.0 D0.375 CR- T01 ;
N010 G100 X2.0A Y1.5A T02 ;
N011 G100 X1.5A Y2.5A T02 ;
N012 G105 FE011 LE011 XO0 YO0 RE01 D0.375 T03 ;
N013 G105 FE010 LE010 XO0 YO0 RE01 D0.375 T03 ;
N014 G100 X0A Y0A T02 ;
%

*********************************************************
The PN2222 was a file generated/posted from my CAM program.



N5 (PROGRAM START) (1) PN2222 G20 G90 T1 CR0 ;
N10 G0 X1.0 Y0.8125 Z5.0 ;
N15 (Z RAPID) Z0.05 ;
N20 (LINEAR MOVE) F5.0 G1 X4.0 ;
N25 (CIRC MOVE) G3 X4.1875 Y1.0 XC4.0 YC1.0;
N30 (LINEAR MOVE) F5.0 G1 Y2.0 ;
N35 (CIRC MOVE) G3 X4.0 Y2.1875 XC4.0 YC2.0;
N40 (LINEAR MOVE) F5.0 G1 X3.375 ;
N45 (CIRC MOVE) G2 X3.1875 Y2.375 XC3.375 YC2.375;
N50 (LINEAR MOVE) F5.0 G1 Y2.625 ;
N55 (CIRC MOVE) G3 X2.625 Y3.1875 XC2.625 YC2.625;
N60 (LINEAR MOVE) F5.0 G1 X1.0 ;
N65 (CIRC MOVE) G3 X0.8125 Y3.0 XC1.0 YC3.0;
N70 (LINEAR MOVE) F5.0 G1 Y1.0 ;
N75 (CIRC MOVE) G3 X1.0 Y0.8125 XC1.0 YC1.0;
N80 (SEGMENT START) (2) G0 X2.0 Y1.5 Z0.1 ;
N85 (XY RAPID) F5.0 G0 X1.5 Y2.5 ;
% ;
(FILE END) ;

[grzeniua]

The program posted by me was created by EZ-CAM ver. 14, but it's possible that I have used wrong options and thus received wrong format.. I have to play with that a bit more...

Anyway thanks for your example!

Then I have to ask if you can advice me some options applicable for my machine? I'm notsure how to generate...

About the cable - I've got that - greetings to NC cams

To whom it may concern - see attached pic

[One of Many]

Now that I looked again at the program you posted, it does look familiar. It must be a posting for a newer version of the EZ-Trak SX or DX control. It is very much like the files I have on the EZ-Path lathe at work. No. I don't expect they are compatible.

Good to hear about the cable so soon. One problem down, 20 to go!
I'll help If I can as far as the control. There are some differences. I rarely use my control for programming any more. The cam system is so much easier.

DC

[grzeniua]

Now the cable is already prepared, tommorow maybe I'll have an opportunity to try to connect

I'll keep you posted about the progress.

Greg

[grzeniua]

So....
Finally I tried! I've got a cable prepared basing on my previous post but it deosn't seem to work.
I have a laptop with Win2k and as I read a lot different posts machintek wrote that EZ-LINK is an old application for DOS. That's OK - I've scored a bootable CD with pure DOS and EZ-LINK. The problem here is that I'm not able to write any file to CD, but it's not important for the moment, I can handle that.
Finally I've connected PC to EZ-LINK and there was no reaction:
EZ TRAK PLUS control unit displayed "CANNOT LINK", EZ-LINK displayed READY..and nothing happened.
Then I've realized that I can check the RS connector at EZ TRAK - I've measured the voltage between pin7 (GND) and pin2 = 0V, between pin7 (GND) and pin3 = -9V. To me it means that pin3 is TxD (I think it's reversed with pin2) and is not in accordance with my specification, rather with One Of Many .
I've swaped pin2 & pin3 and started EZ-LINK again. Now I started the transmission and EZ-LINK has detected something because it has displayed "WORKING..." but the control unit acts in the same way: immediately displays "Cannot link".
I suppose that there's some trouble on the cable itself.

One Of Many I have a huge request: could you review again your schematic with your cable in real? I suppose that this would help me a lot and maybe I should build up another one. It's possible that this could work, although it's not a typical configuration.

If someone uses EZ-LINK: is the program sent from control being displayed on the screen? so I can see the syntax. Or you have to save to file (it's impossible for me at this stage because my hard disks are NTFS partitions and DOS simply doesn't recognize them).

I wrote a lot!!! Hope you can help me, thanks in advance!
Greg

[One of Many]

Originally Posted by grzeniua So.... Finally I tried! I've got a cable prepared basing on my previous post but it deosn't seem to work. I have a laptop with Win2k and as I read a lot different posts machintek wrote that EZ-LINK is an old application for DOS. That's OK - I've scored a bootable CD with pure DOS and EZ-LINK. The problem here is that I'm not able to write any file to CD, but it's not important for the moment, I can handle that. Finally I've connected PC to EZ-LINK and there was no reaction: EZ TRAK PLUS control unit displayed "CANNOT LINK", EZ-LINK displayed READY..and nothing happened. Then I've realized that I can check the RS connector at EZ TRAK - I've measured the voltage between pin7 (GND) and pin2 = 0V, between pin7 (GND) and pin3 = -9V. To me it means that pin3 is TxD (I think it's reversed with pin2) and is not in accordance with my specification, rather with One Of Many . I've swaped pin2 & pin3 and started EZ-LINK again. Now I started the transmission and EZ-LINK has detected something because it has displayed "WORKING..." but the control unit acts in the same way: immediately displays "Cannot link". I suppose that there's some trouble on the cable itself.

In post #2, I warned about the pins 2 and 3 possibly being reversed. I can't recall, but it seems I may have swapped mine at the control to work with a cable I made up for use on other pieces of com port equipment. So, yours could be as original. I think I did the same as you checking voltages and finding out they were reversed. 6 or 7 years ago, these things aren't as fresh memories as they used to be.

I use mine on a laptop with Win98 and EZlink, no problems. Win2k being a NT based system, I have had all sorts of trouble with dos type programs. There will be no display change during tranfer, at least for the dos version. It acts as a server only. Everything is done at the machine control. In EZlink, Sending or recieving you can set the directory prior to linking. Make sure the buad rate is set to 4800, 7 bit even or no parity(can't recall, but I'll check later).

You could cut and paste the files I previously posted in a notepad document and see if they transmit OK. Make sure it is saved as (up to 8 digit file name) ####.TXT and EZlink is set on the directory holding them. Keep the % at the end and the PN at the header, although the PN may not be as critical. Syntax and format are going to be important for the machine to recognize the files during transfer.

I'd find an older PC machine with a more compatable environment to run with. The old technology conflicts with the new may only compound your troubles.

The cable is what it is. Not much I can say since it works great as drawn for my machine.

DC

[NC Cams]

Hint: make sure your hard drive in your Extrak is NOT bigger nor formatted bigger than your OEM supplied H/D from BPT. The 'Trak software ONLY works with an OEM H/D format and size. IF it is bigger or not formatted to OEM format size, you could be putting data where 'Trak can't/wont find it. If that happened, you have to wipe and FDISK to proper size - be sure to back-up BEFORE HAND.

Hint: make sure your communication port is NOT a low voltage type. Some 3.3 volt late model computers won't communicate to the mid-90's vintage hardware in the 'Traks.

Hint: Think and act in MSDOS 6.22 when it comes to 'Trak. Ver 7 dos and "psuedo DOS" for 95 and above may not speak well with the older hardare/protocalls in a 'Trak. "THINK" 1995, not 2006.....

Hint: Boot your 'Trak to DOS and upgrade to DOS 6.22 for "latest" version that we've PROVED will work. Our original install was DOS 5. Our system works better now that we u/g'd to 6.22.

Hint: try defragging H/D once you U/G to 6.22. DOS "defrag" worked fine enough for us and helped speed up system operation.

Hint: make sure you bios does NOT have LBA enabled. THis will screw up the machine's ability to read and store data. Again, LBA didn't exist in mid 90's and the 'Trak won't work with it....

Isn't it fun trying to resurrect "old" equipment?????

GRZ: we used the code you have to write G code for our machine and it runs. I dunno how to help with the data transfer deal asside from suggesting to use a floppy..... or booting in DOS and working outside 'Extrak.

Hint: My version of 'Trak (5, 6 and 7) don't didn't have the EZLINK program anywhere to be found on the install disk - maybe it isn't compatible unless you run it from C:\ prompt...

[One of Many]

Hint: These versions(1989-1992?) of EZ Trak were made........almost before hard drives were more common than ramdisks! <Chuckles!>

None on them!

DC

[grzeniua]

Guys,
many thanks for your posts, but frankly speaking I feel so much dizzy & confused....so many hints/tips/instructions...
Regarding PC - I haven't got old one and I don't have any access to get it from anyone so I have to figure out how can I manage (maybe I'll find an old desktop 'cuz I recall that there should be something in the cellar ).

I'll try to build up a cable according to One of Many schematic, although I have some doubts... but if it's confirmed, I'll try!

There's no HD in EZ-TRAK control..

Thanks a lot for now!
Greg