![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| Bridgeport and Hardinge Mills Discuss Bridgeport and Hardinge Mills here! |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
I recently bought an old air operated index head and have stripped all of the air and indexing parts from it and propose to drive it with a stepper motor so that I can use as a 4th Axis on my BOSS retrofit. Can anyone offer advice or thoughts on what reduction I should use, it will be timing belt driven so I have a large range of possible combinations to choose from and was wondering if there was an optimum. Hood |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Hood, I am sure I am not telling you anything new but typically a 4th axis/rotary table is driven by a worm gear. This for the ability to better hold position as well as for better resolution/accuracy. Most now have a brake on them as well. George
__________________ (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| George This Indexer has a worm but it has a fair bit of backlash so I thought of driving with a stepper and pulley arrangement. Its a good quality Indexer, Bristol Erickson 800 but I think there was no need for a zero backlash worm as the way it indexed was it rotated until a pawl dropped into the next notch, this activated a reverse in rotation which locked the pawl into the back of the notch then a brake was operated to hold everthing in place. As I am not wanting a fixed Indexing axis I was hoping a stepper with maybe a reduction of 10:1 would give me enough holding torque and also the resolution would be reasonable. Possibly I might be better looking to see if there is any way that I can mount the worm in a cam so that I can adjust the backlash out of it. Thanks for the reply and the possible headaches I am going to get by actually having to think about this ![]() Hood |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |