![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| Bridgeport and Hardinge Mills Discuss Bridgeport and Hardinge Mills here! |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
I'm currently running a lot of contouring on my VMC1000.Some of the file sizes are coming in +20 megs. I am drip feeding at 115 kps thru Remo, but lets say a 20 meg file is 4 hours of run time, it takes 10 hrs to drip feed at that baud rate. No cool. My question is, I tried to run without out block numbers, thinking this might save upwards of 30% of file size but I get an error. In ISO mode can the Heid 426 run without block numbers? If so what does my header and footer of the file have to look like? Or is it a parameter issue? |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Thanks, I thought they were probably finicky on the format, even in iso. My Fadal can do it either way, depending on the header and last line of the program. I'll try the resolution in the program to see if I can tune it down some. I'm going to compare the same geometry posted out to the Fadal and the VMC1000 to see how the file sizes stack up(both with block numbers) to see how close they are. |
![]() |
| Tags |
| heidenheim tnc 426 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need Help!- Bridg. 760\22 Heid TNC 370 | JNFSWE | Bridgeport and Hardinge Mills | 1 | 08-25-2008 08:18 PM |
| INT412X HEID.2500 | Jurek | Bridgeport and Hardinge Mills | 3 | 05-18-2008 04:50 PM |
| Block Numbers | phoodieman | Mastercam | 2 | 01-22-2008 03:40 PM |
| Different Sizes | SCHootie | Stepper Motors and Drives | 1 | 02-20-2007 12:29 AM |
| RS232 program block by block | smoregrava | General CNC (Mill and Lathe) Control Software (NC) | 3 | 12-22-2005 12:52 AM |