![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| BobCad-Cam Discuss all BobCad software here. |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Im having some problems with solid works files that have geometry above z-0 that should not be there. I have checked these files with rhino and alias and they show nothing.V23 and 21 show the same problem. I am attaching a file that has these problems. I have sent them to bobcad and they are looking at it. just wondering if anyone has seen the same problem. Thanks |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
I might be way off here but there was something I remembered about it. Also, BobCAD's CAD module will also occasionally create surfaces that show above Z zero when you verify the entities even if you didn't draw them that way. Not sure what that's about. EDIT: You can reverse the normal by going to Utilities - Reverse Surface Normal |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| This sounds like what you are seeing is "bounds data" and not geometry above zero. More info would help. So is what you are saying is you import a model that has geometry set at Z 0 and when you entity summary it is .0012 or something like that? |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Yeah, I think this is bounds data. One way you can check it is to create a new layer and extract all the edges to it then hide the part layer and look again at the entity summary. I have 4 digits viewable so it then see's .0001. If you look in front view and zoom in on the upper left corner you will see where that edge rises above z a smidgeon. The bounds data thing is most likely a tolerance setting in the other app that creates the issue. look in your other app for a tolerance setting and set it to something like .00001 then try to re-export the geometry to bobcad and see if it changes to a more true value. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| I understand the extracted edges are at z0 but if you are doing 3d rough the part still needs to move down .1845 to machine. Is there a way to fix this or do i need to try tolerence settings in SW. Thanks Dave |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| This is a question I never answered. Our fix was to up the tol settings in the creating app and get the proper value. I dont have solidworks so I couldnt test it for you and other apps settings didnt change it. I would try to see if solidworks can fix it with a tolerance change. This question though has been in the back of my mind and I just spoke to a machine operator and set a test in motion. "For a 3d toolpath, does moving imported geometry down by the bounds data, or changing the top of part setting in the feature edit, change the surface toolpath and result in less of a cut?" I'll post back the answer I come up with. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Solid works! | LT1TRUCK | General CNC (Mill and Lathe) Control Software (NC) | 3 | 01-24-2008 08:22 PM |
| just got solid works | bearracecars | Solidworks | 8 | 08-01-2007 11:25 PM |
| Solid Works or AutoCad??? | bill south | General CAM Discussion | 14 | 03-02-2006 10:06 PM |
| Which came first, Solid Edge or Solid Works? | Arnie | General CAM Discussion | 3 | 09-15-2004 06:25 AM |
| solid works cnc files | krustykrab | Mastercam | 38 | 06-19-2004 09:53 AM |