CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > MetalWorking Machines > Benchtop Machines


Benchtop Machines Discuss all mini mills sherline, taig, square column, round column and CNC mill conversions here!


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 01-05-2008, 04:27 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 55
lagfish is on a distinguished road
why angular contact bearings for X3?

I don't understand why some choose to replace the stock thrust bearings with angular contact bearings? As far as I can tell, there is no radial force on the bearings. Any radial force is supported by the dovetail ways. The precision thrust bearing on mcmaster that looks similar to the stock ones on the x3 (6681K12) says they have a max dynamic rating of 2110lbs. This is more than enough to withstand the cutting forces.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 01-05-2008, 04:42 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: madagascar
Posts: 208
cncuser1 is on a distinguished road
The reason why angular contact bearings are preferd on the roller ball lead screws has been explained in detial in prevoius posts ( try a search) but the short answer is that by squeezing two of them you take up axizl play in the bearings, thereby gettinng much less backlash.

Two angular contact bearinngs would be used on a machine that also has two ball nuts on one screw. the ball nuts are separated by bellville washers.

Like i said try a search, it has all been talked about bbefore.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 01-05-2008, 11:08 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 55
lagfish is on a distinguished road
I already did a search on thrust bearings. Couldn't find anything.
Yes, by squeezing them together you are preloading them to avoid axial play. This can be, and is done with the STOCK thrust bearings on the stock X3.
Now my original question was, why is it better to replace the stock THRUST bearings with ANGULAR CONTACT bearings?
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 01-06-2008, 05:29 AM
LongRat's Avatar  
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Age: 31
Posts: 658
LongRat is on a distinguished road
I wondered that myself. I can only assume that the stiffness of the preloaded angular contact pair is greater than that of preloaded axial thrust bearings. When I converted my X2 to CNC, I used preloaded axial thrust bearings, thinking that if it was insufficient, I had lost very little as they are so much cheaper than angular contacts. 2 years down the line, I am still running all the same bearings and still have absolutely zero end float, so I am not complaining.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 01-06-2008, 06:03 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 384
skmetal7 is on a distinguished road
I guess its up to you and your willingness to mount angular contacts. I'm using a/c bearings on my x2 mini mill, I guess I thought that it would be better in the long run and easier to fit on the axes. check out my conversion here (a work in progress): Another X2 CNC Conversion (yay!)

You can get nice sized ones for 5/8" ballscrews from vxb.com or their ebay store for like $9.00 a set, so they aren't too expensive.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 01-07-2008, 01:29 AM
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 55
lagfish is on a distinguished road
I checked out the vxb site. I couldn't find any info on loading capacity or contact angle.

ABEC-7, 12mm ID, 15 deg, A/C contact bearings on McMaster states max radial load of 1243 lbs. If we assume axial to radial load capacity is proportional to the contact angle (I don't know if this is right, but it makes sense intuitively), then in theory the max axial load should be 1243 * 15 / 85 = 220 lbs. This is probably not enough.

If the VXB bearings have a higher contact angle than the mcmaster carr ones - say 40 deg, then it should work. Has anyone contacted them about their bearing specs?

If the bearings don't have to support radial loads, then going with A/C bearings is actually a compromise over thrust bearings.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 01-08-2008, 06:12 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 55
lagfish is on a distinguished road
I just talked to vxb.com, the 7201 bearings have 40 deg contact angle.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
angular contact bearings, or not klick0 Linear and Rotary Motion 22 12-30-2007 05:17 AM
angular contact bearings ( 8mm id ) veteq Linear and Rotary Motion 4 12-19-2007 12:19 AM
Angular Contact Bearings For Spindle Kakarott Linear and Rotary Motion 4 11-13-2007 04:18 PM
Angular contact bearings martinw Mechanical Calculations/Engineering Design 38 12-26-2006 07:35 AM
Ball screws and angular contact bearings? dowling177 Mechanical Calculations/Engineering Design 1 01-27-2005 04:21 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353