![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| Benchtop Machines Discuss all mini mills sherline, taig, square column, round column and CNC mill conversions here! |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Out of round on last cut Milling a 44mm hole with a 12mm HSS 3 flute through a 1" steel plate, cutting down hill. Told it to 'drill' 26mm deep to make sure it went through. The software did it in 14 steps of 1.857mm so the last cut was a a bit lighter. All went well until the last cut when it decided to cut all the way up the side of the hole. My fine chips became needles and it went oversize with a bulge at 10 o'clock. It then did exactly the same on the second hole. It's okay because I was going to clean it up with a boring head anyway and I can make the bushing that goes in it oversize if necessary. My guess is that the tool was bending towards the center all the way down then flexed out when there was no more metal underneath it. Is there a work around for this, or is it something else |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Cutter Path? What was the cutter path followed? Did you program it to drill the center out, then work outwards, or did you program it to drill close/at the perimeter? I've found that the specific cutter path you follow has a large effect on the quality and time of milled holes. John |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| The software decided to do it with a centre plunge and then two cuts. 27.7mm diam, then 43.4mm leaving me 0.6mm to clean out with the boring head. I tried the next plate cutting up hill and it went egg shaped with a lip at the bottom where the last cut went undersized. It has to be tool drag and flex somehere in the system. Nobody mentioned drag from the cutting action bending the mill out of shape, time to get out the DTI and then lean on it a bit |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| going from 27 to 43 is a big step, reduce your cutter overlap take it it did this at full depth think your strategy was all wrong what software you using? mike |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
|
Hi Mike I'm using g-simple very badly, I should have included a finishing cut that would have spiraled down in to the hole with minimal tool drag and made it all perfect. g-simple draws a series of paralel tool paths across the billet and then starts cutting them from bottom left in a series of passes at ever increasing depth. If it hits an outline it follows it with a clean up allowance if you asked for one. It then goes back to the paralel paths to remove any metal left standing outside the ouline(s). Having cut the outline(s) it then does any pockets one after the other in a similar fashion. Round holes it cuts as 360 degree arcs. Sounds primitive but it is a darned sight better than my home brewed software which spiralled in to size at full depth. I wrote that before I found this here site and got eddjukated, may need to revisit it, but it isn't easy to come up with reasonable tool paths for every circumstance. I have a notion to break the part into a myriad of tiny squares and remember how deep each one is and how deep it can go. That would allow for a lot of whittling before I went for the final shape. Understanding the problem is halfway to a solution, now I know that I have to allow for the machine bending out of shape due to cutting drag I can do something about it. I don't want to spend thousands on software, I'd rather spend it on more tangible assets ![]() best regards Robin |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| try cambam too best of all its free ace converter's also free mike |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Hi Robin, CNC machining is a bit like computers. Went you first get involved you are paranoid about the hardware then, after a while it suddenly dawns on you that really what counts is the software. You've just reached that point, congratulations. Good software is one of the most important asset you will buy for your CNC machine and it doesn't need to cost so much. Regards Phil PS: I remember many years ago developing my own computer program that would perform calculates based on an input/output matrix table. After 3 months of effort somebody showed me a new, commercially available piece of software called a Spread Sheet.
|
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| can't argue with that good software makes a big difference try dolphin |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| I don't need software to do the actual machine control, I just need to convert dxf to tool paths and G codes. I have downloaded Cambam instantly plummetting to the botttom of the learning curve, doubtless I shall still be using gsimple for the forseeable future |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| The wizards in the free demo version of MACH3 will do what you need with virtually a horizontal learning curve. If you have never used Wizards you should at least have a look. I think they will fit you needs perfectly. Phil |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
Cheers. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| round and round we go | omegaghost | Benchtop Machines | 5 | 01-10-2007 11:25 AM |
| Which is better, round or square rails? | digits | General Metal Working Machines | 5 | 11-13-2006 07:09 AM |
| Round Numbers | stampman | Fanuc | 4 | 09-05-2006 07:12 PM |
| round ram head | locoind | Bridgeport and Hardinge Mills | 3 | 04-20-2006 10:44 PM |
| Round corners | slawsonb | SheetCam | 15 | 01-26-2006 05:22 PM |