Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Stepper physical connectins

  1. #1
    Registered
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Smile Stepper physical connectins

    I'm considering the purchase of a Sieg X3 and converting it to CNC. I was wondering the pros and cons between direct coupled stepper motors on the X, Y, & Z axis and offset steppers with a gear and belt?

    thanks


  2. #2
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Stavanger, Norway
    Posts
    2,185
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Correctly designed direct drive works fine. Why complicate it.

    Phil

    Quote Originally Posted by billsp View Post
    I'm considering the purchase of a Sieg X3 and converting it to CNC. I was wondering the pros and cons between direct coupled stepper motors on the X, Y, & Z axis and offset steppers with a gear and belt?

    thanks


  3. #3
    Gold Member mxtras's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,810
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Well, for starters - using a belt and pulleys allows you to effectively multiply the output (torque) potential from the motors and increase your potential accuracy. The cost of doing so is that you loose some speed.

    Scott
    Consistency is a good thing....unless you're consistently an idiot.


  4. #4
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Stavanger, Norway
    Posts
    2,185
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    You could just use a bigger stepper with direct drive. The normal issue with steppers is they are to slow for decent rapids so gearing down just makes it worse.

    The critical issue with steppers is you need a bit extra in the size department in order to avoid the risk of lost steps.

    A direct drive will give more than enough accuracy for the capabilities of an X3.

    Just some thoughts from a novice.

    Phil

    Quote Originally Posted by mxtras View Post
    Well, for starters - using a belt and pulleys allows you to effectively multiply the output (torque) potential from the motors and increase your potential accuracy. The cost of doing so is that you loose some speed.

    Scott


  • #5
    Registered
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    424
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mxtras View Post
    Well, for starters - using a belt and pulleys allows you to effectively multiply the output (torque) potential from the motors and increase your potential accuracy. The cost of doing so is that you loose some speed.

    Scott
    You loose speed in proportion to the amount of torque you gain not including loses for friction of the belt which can be enough to make a difference. I am direct coupling, this size machine and the average size stepper will be just fine. The only benefit I have seen in the belt drive is getting the stepper out of the way.

    chris


  • Similar Threads

    1. tracing physical samples into CAD
      By mark_christians in forum WoodWorking
      Replies: 4
      Last Post: 03-09-2007, 01:03 PM
    2. duplicating existing physical item/pattern
      By memilanuk in forum WoodWorking
      Replies: 3
      Last Post: 05-29-2006, 12:43 PM
    3. Feedback Calibration vs Physical Alignment
      By jdownie in forum DIY CNC Router Table Machines
      Replies: 7
      Last Post: 03-23-2006, 10:03 AM
    4. stepper motor size(physical)
      By Bloy2004 in forum Stepper Motors and Drives
      Replies: 4
      Last Post: 06-22-2004, 09:31 PM
    5. Physical difference between a stepper,servo and a DC motor
      By ynneb in forum General Electronics Discussion
      Replies: 1
      Last Post: 02-22-2004, 11:40 PM

    Posting Permissions


     


    About CNCzone.com

      We are the largest and most active discussion forum from DIY CNC Machines to the Cad/Cam software to run them. The site is 100% free to join and use, so join today!

    Follow us on

    Facebook Dribbble RSS Feed


    Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.