![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| Benchtop Machines Discuss all mini mills sherline, taig, square column, round column and CNC mill conversions here! |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
I am looking for some sort of constant offset tooling for my er-16 spindle on my taig mill. I saw this one but what sort of concentricity (is that even the right term?) can even expect with a system like that? What about blank collets that retain the endmill via a set screw? What sort of accuracy can you expect with that? Collars on the end mill that just repeat the tool height what sort of repeatability can expect changing back and forth? I also saw this , he claims .0005 concentricity, at im not sure what distance away from the spindle nose but that seems like an alright system? Last edited by impact; 02-13-2006 at 12:56 PM. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| The last link with the concentricity. Has to do with how true the mills center core is while it's spinning. The length of your mill and it's trueness ((is that a word?)) would result in the final run out. Quality and over all abuse would have those numbers vary some. It doesn't have anything to do with tool height. Specifically. If you goto Swede's website at www.5bears.com, under cnc mill. He has a little tool that he made to set stop collars on mills. Which allow him to retain a "known" tool height. I planned to use that, or a tormach type setup in my r8 spindle. You should be able to get good repeatability with one of the set screw style holders. You just label is as tool1, then measure it's offset. Then you have another one for tool2, with another offset. These offsets should be retained in a list of tools for your machining software. You just make sure you put the correct tool in the mill, at the correct tool change time. The machine should be able to make adjustments based on your recorded offset. ((hope that makes sense)) |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Oh, in follow up to your post with the rapid tool changer by hightechsystemsllc. I'm extreme interest in any follow ups from other users. http://www.hightechsystemsllc.com/in...s/Page1416.htm They appear to have a rapid tool changer for r8. I'm curious to the amount of side cutting force that they can handle. As well as run out/repeatability between changes. **time to shoot them an email** 149 bucks for their system and 5 collets looks like a pretty good deal, assuming it's well made. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| I have the High Tech tool changer on my Taig. I love it, it's the best modification I have made. I also have the High Tech vise and tooling plate. All parts are of very high quality. Can't be beat for the money. I highly recommend High Tech. Mike P.S. I have not measured the runout and I do not think I will. There was no difference in the quality of cut after I added the tool changer. Works for me. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| FYI Response email from HighTech ***** The runout varies with the spindle and the mill. It is around .002" give or take alittle. Repeatibilty is extremely good. I haven't even measured it because it is not a factor. I am sure it is within a .0002". The holding power of the spindle right now is rated for 1hp spindles. It will have some deflection because you are extending the lenght of the spindle. You can specify which 5 tools you would like. Such as 5 (1/8) ect. ***** Looks like a pretty good deal, I may have to pick it up. Trying to find out how much z travel you loose with the adapater. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
thank you. Owen |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| From what I gathered/read. You need to have it in a collet. **Installs directly into a 3/4” collet such as R-8 on the mill.** I'd assume that you would want to get the best collet you can find. The biggest hangup for me currently is the amount of z-axis that you might lose with having it installed, and how much room you need to replace the tool. I'm definately looking at this and the tormach system. Price seems to be comparable, with the exception that the tormach system is not really a quick change. But you appear to gain more z height. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
Owen |
| Sponsored Links |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |