Build Thread My Grizzly G9729 3 in 1 CNC Conversion - Page 3


Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 117

Thread: My Grizzly G9729 3 in 1 CNC Conversion

  1. #41
    Member Fastest1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4415
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    They get all of our money!
    Quote Originally Posted by BrokenRotor View Post
    Okay, it seems Automation will be getting lots of my money soon, ha ha.. I am starting to feel like a needy kid asking all these questions, but you and fanblade already invented the wheel and I don't want to reinvent it, so to speak.

    1) So do the nema 23 motors have different torque ranges, or is that fixed by the size of the motor? Or maybe I should just ask which ones you bought?

    Yes they do have different ratings as indicated by the oz. The way in which they are wired will give different results as will the voltage they are operated upon. A true method of stepper decision would involve calculating the expected rpm use of that stepper, find the stepper with the highest torque and or speed at that rpm and design your gearing or mechanical advantage around those. Most of us just install what has worked well for others. It really just depends on how much research you want to do. Each decision can be analyzed til procrastination takes over.

    2) Same with the ball screws, which ones did you buy?

    Most people go with Chai aka LinearMotion2009 (cant remember if the 2009 is correct). He will machine them anyway you want them and will provide additional nuts or whatever you request.

    3) It looks like you bought the ball screw bearing blocks from Automation also?

    Btw, We suspect Automation also buys his parts from Chai.

    Now for the software side of things:
    What software do I need?
    1) I was told CamBam is good. That seems to be the drawing package peice.

    Great CAD program at probably the best price for a person just starting out. It might have limitations but a beginner wont notice them for years if then.

    2) Mach3 seems to be the software to run the mills X,Y,Z motors? Is this used only for manual control, or can you send it G-Codes or whatever it's called to do the automated milling functions?

    Mach3 is good stuff. Hopefully Mach4 will be introduced soon and we will get away from the PP use. Some swear by EMC and it is free. I have seen things made with both that were very well done. Each has its supporters.

    3) Do I need some kind of program to go from the CamBam drawing to the Mach3 program?

    No, CAMBAM will generate the necessary GCode for your machine whether it runs Mach3 or EMC. Both of those programs deal with the motion control and GCode interpretation.

    I'll stop there for now. Don't want to overload my brain, Lol.

    It only gets worse and more in depth. Enjoy.

    Thanks again for all the help.

    Steve




  2. #42
    Member Fastest1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4415
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    I was reading an earlier post in this thread. It was wondering if you needed a VFD (variable frequency drive) on a mill. The question was answered but just in general terms. To be a little more specific,this is just a way to control the speed of the spindle motor (or any motor). Depending on which type of motor you have (AC or DC) will determine the method of control. AC will use a VFD where you could run a 3 phase AC motor on single phase for example. A DC motor runs via an inverter.



  3. #43
    Member FannBlade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    695
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BrokenRotor View Post
    Okay, it seems Automation will be getting lots of my money soon, ha ha.. I am starting to feel like a needy kid asking all these questions, but you and fanblade already invented the wheel and I don't want to reinvent it, so to speak.

    Now for the software side of things:
    What software do I need?
    1) I was told CamBam is good. That seems to be the drawing package peice.

    2) Mach3 seems to be the software to run the mills X,Y,Z motors? Is this used only for manual control, or can you send it G-Codes or whatever it's called to do the automated milling functions?

    3) Do I need some kind of program to go from the CamBam drawing to the Mach3 program?

    Steve
    1. I would look at Vectric Cut 2D VERY easy CAM program to run. CamBam can be a little overwhelming at first(at least for me). You can do very simple drawings in it and if you get creative it can handle most all you will need.

    2. Yea Mach3 for control functions. What I really like about Mach are the Lathe wizards that will handle most everything for turning right at the machine.

    3. I personally use Alibre CAD for more complex drawings they offer a cheap version for less then $200. You can probably put this off and just play with the CAM software till comfortable and need more options.



  4. #44
    Registered
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    10
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    ZeroFighter....Been reading through your build, very nice. I notice though that your mounting of the Y ballscrew is to a table that is much bigger than what I have on my machine. Can you say more on that? I'm thinking I need to get that bigger table. Maybe I missed it but I don't think this was covered in Fanblade's thread either...Bruce



  5. #45
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    141
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Hey Bruce,
    Do you have the Grizzly version of the machine? I know there are a few versions out there that are all slightly different but I believe are all made in the same factory. I picked up the grizzly one because it has the longest travel out of the bench models I've found. Not sure if that helps, but worst case, you might be able to order that one part from Grizzly and get a bit more travel...

    Carl



  6. #46
    Registered
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    10
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Carl...Yea, mine is a Grizzly, model 4015Z; different than yours but looks almost the same. I'l see if I can just order the table off of your model - G9729. ..anxious to see your next update...Bruce



  7. #47
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    141
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Good luck Bruce, and link us to your machine if you do the conversion.

    I've made some things on my machine aside from our usual suspension parts (mostly adjustable length 7075 with rod ends).

    These are hood/trunk pins made from 7075 as well, I broke the cheap chinese aluminum ones I had bought, they were garbage.

    My Grizzly G9729 3 in 1 CNC Conversion-13_11_24_009-jpg

    My Grizzly G9729 3 in 1 CNC Conversion-13_11_24_016-jpg

    My Grizzly G9729 3 in 1 CNC Conversion-13_11_24_017-jpg



  8. #48
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    141
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Also needed to make 2 master cylinder adapters to fit the reservoirs, tried to make them by drawing the contour I needed but was too complex, just did it with the wizards instead. Made 2 and screwed them up, then made 2 good ones. Did the threads with a die, once my speed sensor is working I can get much nicer threads with the CNC.

    My Grizzly G9729 3 in 1 CNC Conversion-13_11_09_004-jpg

    My Grizzly G9729 3 in 1 CNC Conversion-13_11_09_005-jpg

    My Grizzly G9729 3 in 1 CNC Conversion-13_11_09_006-jpg



  9. #49
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    141
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    These are a couple of the parts my friend and I produce for Mazda RX-7's.

    My Grizzly G9729 3 in 1 CNC Conversion-rca_stabilink_011_full-jpg



  10. #50
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    141
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Some test turning





  11. #51
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    141
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Machining a door handle support end:





  12. #52
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    141
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    And one more. Really need to fix the spindle. Vibrates like crazy.





  13. #53
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    141
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    I made some improvements to the mill head, and have a plan to re-do the Z axis bracketry. Right now it's 4 pieces, and I plan on changed it to 2 pieces.

    My Grizzly G9729 3 in 1 CNC Conversion-splindle_bracket_new-jpg

    That will be the bottom part, 3/4" 6061, will be much stiffer than what I have now. Right now when the spindle heats up, it doesn't travel too smooth, this will help somewhat. Will also do the other part of the Z work.

    Managed to make some cool stuff with the lathe:
    My Grizzly G9729 3 in 1 CNC Conversion-2014-03-07-22-10-29-jpg
    My Grizzly G9729 3 in 1 CNC Conversion-2014-03-08-14-34-10-jpg

    It's a mold for 50mm carbon fiber intake velocity stacks.



  14. #54
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    141
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    I have a few questions on things I want to improve.

    The mill still has some vibration. I want to fill the head stock with epoxy/substrate, think this is useful to do? It's completely hollow and the mill head hangs out pretty far from the tower.

    Belt driven X/Y axis? Would it be wise for me to go away from direct drive, and move to belt driven for the stepper motors? I would get more torque, and some finer step controls, although I'm not sure that is necessary.

    Thoughts?

    Thanks,



  15. #55
    Registered
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    10
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    I haven't done anything with direct drive but have used the belt drive (McMaster-carr sells the belts and the gears). I'm not sure there is a clear winner but I think it might be easier with belts to revert to manual operation (just cut the power supply and use the original hand cranks) and also in the event of a head crash the belt will slip and act a bit like a fuse. One problem though is that if chips or even dust build-up finds its way into the splines of the cog, it affects the quality of cutting. So a guard or something is needed.



  16. #56
    Member Fastest1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4415
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Zero, What is your micro stepping value set up in your controller? You might be able to use a finer resolution.

    Bruce, The idea of manual machining on a CNC machine is a waste of time. Everybody thinks this is important including me on their first machine or so, until they learn to use MDI, an MPG or a Shuttle Pro. You could use dual shaft steppers and merely install hand wheels and accomplish the same thing. If you use ball screws in your transformation they wont offer enough resistance for good manual machining.

    In regards to the belt slipping during a crash or running into a physical limit of some kind is that the stepper will stall first most likely.



  17. #57
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    141
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Fastest1, not too concerned with resolution, more so the extra torque I'd see by the gearing I could use with the belts, is it worth it?

    Right now my issues seem to be with stiffness, of my Z lathe axis, Y, mill axis, as well as the gib adjustment to remove any clunking/vibration I see when milling. The table itself is hard, like you found, to get the gibs adjusted just so, no binding, but tight enough to not clunk or move when milling.

    Did you ever get your mill part of your 9729 finished?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Sorry, that last one was directed to FannBlade, not you!



  18. #58
    Member Fastest1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4415
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Zero, most of my machines are direct drive.

    I do have 2 machines that are mechanically geared down to almost slow speeds. 1 of those is actually being refitted with pulleys and belts now. I plan on changing ratio for more speed. Though I will be running much more modern electronics and steppers, larger too. So far all of my machines have been able to easily overload the tool or spindle, causing breakage of the part or tool. Even on my Sherlines. Torque really doesn't seem to be an issue in my experience.

    Gib adjustment and getting it right changes everything.

    A lazy man does it twice.


  19. #59
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    141
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Ok, that's sort of what I was looking for. Whether direct drive was the way to go for me. I have 400oz steppers on there which should be enough. Mostly machine aluminum anyways.

    Sent from my SGH-I337M using Tapatalk



  20. #60
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    7063
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Belts make no sense with steppers - a better motor will cost about the same, or likely less, than all the extra belts, pulleys, bearings and housings. Belts are typically used on drives to change the speed range. On servo machines, they're used because most servo motors are capable of RPMs far beyond what can be used in a direct drive setup. So, a belt drive is added to reduce the speed, and allow a smaller motor to be used. Steppers have max torque at low RPM, where you need it, so belt reducers just aren't needed, when it's so cheap and easy to simply fit a larger motor.

    Regards,
    Ray L.



Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


About CNCzone.com

    We are the largest and most active discussion forum for manufacturing industry. The site is 100% free to join and use, so join today!

Follow us on


Our Brands

My Grizzly G9729 3 in 1 CNC Conversion

My Grizzly G9729 3 in 1 CNC Conversion