Here we have a proven domestic enemy of the US. And he has not been arrested, why not? He is subverting the constitution and calling for civil disobediance, that alone is a terrorist and we have laws to deal with people like that.

Speaking at the opening plenary session of the Clinton Global
Initiative Annual Meeting in New York, Gore said: "If you're a young
person looking at the future of this planet and looking at what is
being done right now, and not done, I believe we have reached the stage
where it is time for civil disobedience to prevent the construction of
new coal plants that do not have carbon capture and sequestration."
How come they consider it important that a woman has a choice in killing her unborn child. Yet we are not to have a choice in our own activities if it some how fails to comply with the new religion of the environment and global warming/ climate change. AGENDA.???????????????

Both parties subvert the constitution. They agree that the constitution only gets in the way of their great plans (of course, that's what it is there for). The only arguments between the two parties are on which parts of the constitution need to be destroyed. The see-saw battle between the parties results in our freedoms being lost and government power increasing, first being attacked from the one side, then the other. Neither party repeals the damage done by the other. The result is a ratcheting effect, where the gains by each are locked in. The progress is always in the same direction - towards tyranny and away from liberty and government restraint.

Voters are presented with an untenable choice - to choose between false alternatives. Will you vote for loss of your economic freedom and your property rights this time, or will you vote for loss of privacy and loss of restraint on government's use of physical violence?

The press keeps blinders on themselves and their audience. The opponents attack each other with glee, the press works to raise the contest to a fever pitch. Everyone has a jolly old time, being free of anyone spoiling all the fun by pointing out the obvious:

The overriding issue isn't which rights you should lose today, it's freedom vs slavery.

Both parties are poisonous to freedom and contemptuous of the constitution.

I choose not to choose between a socialist who leans towards fascism and a fascist who leans towards socialism.

--97T--

I agree, why is it allowed?
It is a bi party that means the same. I was not talking about a party, but the person that gave the statement. The leading one of the enviro lies.