SpeedsCustom
07-17-2008, 08:12 PM
I'm undertaking a new project on my Taig. Some will disagree some will agree. The discussion of the original Taig motor placement has been discussed over and over. We know how much the motor ways and how much torque it puts on the "z" column. Constantly changing the pulleys drives me crazy, I have cut my knuckles over and over by twisting the allen key. So why not just mount the variable speed motor and be done with it, I wanna tackle both problems at once and solve all in once.
I have two designs. The first design is good, but it minimizes any pulley or belt system. Which I don't like because I end up with only a max speed of 6700RPm with the motor I want too use. Benefits? Motor will be directly in line with the z axis column. No un-needed torque on the column on either side. And Z-axis will have better travel with everything in line. But again, this is a design I like for it's simplicity but then I lose the pulley.
Second design is more complicated. Too make it simple for everyone. The spindle housing is mounted farther from it's original spot. In doing so, I will also extend the Y-axis travel be an inch too compensate. With the same mounting design, I will incorporate one timing belt. A 2:1 ratio single belt should work wonders with a variable speed motor. The gears needs too be small as well as the belt because there will not be much room behind the spindle before interference starts too happen with z-axis stepper.
It's a design I'm working on and it's there, it's just figuring out which pulleys too use etc. A belt would be quieter then gears, but gears may work because I can keep the motor closer the spindle.
-Jason
I have two designs. The first design is good, but it minimizes any pulley or belt system. Which I don't like because I end up with only a max speed of 6700RPm with the motor I want too use. Benefits? Motor will be directly in line with the z axis column. No un-needed torque on the column on either side. And Z-axis will have better travel with everything in line. But again, this is a design I like for it's simplicity but then I lose the pulley.
Second design is more complicated. Too make it simple for everyone. The spindle housing is mounted farther from it's original spot. In doing so, I will also extend the Y-axis travel be an inch too compensate. With the same mounting design, I will incorporate one timing belt. A 2:1 ratio single belt should work wonders with a variable speed motor. The gears needs too be small as well as the belt because there will not be much room behind the spindle before interference starts too happen with z-axis stepper.
It's a design I'm working on and it's there, it's just figuring out which pulleys too use etc. A belt would be quieter then gears, but gears may work because I can keep the motor closer the spindle.
-Jason