View Full Version : Global Warming: Towards a New World Order NOW


NinerSevenTango
04-19-2007, 10:36 PM
"Now it is time for us to rise to our newest and biggest challenge: to fight the first great war of interdependence, the struggle for climate security." -- Margaret Beckett, British Foreign Secretary, in a speech given in New York the day before the UN Security Council meeting.

The UN Security Council this week held its first ever debate on climate change and the potential threat that global warming poses to international security. British foreign secretary Margaret Beckett, who chaired the meeting, organised the open session to highlight what she called the ‘security imperative’ to tackle climate change. According to Beckett, climate change can exacerbate problems that cause conflicts and threaten the entire planet. She was clearly very pleased with the UK-led initiative, stating that: ‘This is a groundbreaking day in the history of the Security Council, the first time ever that we will debate climate change as a matter of international peace and security.’

Who can deny this? Here the groundwork is being laid to use the deadliest power in history to enforce compliance.

Can't say I'm surprised. Maybe those who didn't believe the scheme was about people control on a global level will begin to see it forming now.

--97T--

fizzissist
04-19-2007, 11:55 PM
"Now it is time for us to rise to our newest and biggest challenge: to fight the first great war of interdependence, the struggle for climate security." -- Margaret Beckett, British Foreign Secretary, in a speech given in New York the day before the UN Security Council meeting.


The Great War of Interdependence!!!! Where do I enlist???
We've GOT to join the struggle for Climate Security!!!

So. Who do I shoot first to ensure my interdependence??? If we're truly going to be interdependent, do we shoot each other?

And all this time I thought wars were fought for social and economic reasons....never dreaming that cooler countries were safer, and warmer countries less secure.

NinerSevenTango
04-20-2007, 12:03 AM
Interdependence - the New Fascism.

"Of what importance is all that, if I range men firmly within a discipline they cannot escape? Let them own land or factories as much as they please. The decisive factor is that the State, through the Party, is supreme over them regardless of whether they are owners or workers. All that is unessential; our socialism goes far deeper. It establishes a relationship of the individual to the State, the national community. Why need we trouble to socialize banks and factories? We socialize human beings." -- Adolph Hitler

--97T--

fizzissist
04-20-2007, 12:08 AM
Corn Hoil!
Corn Hoil!
Corn Hoil!

Geof
04-20-2007, 12:26 AM
When trains start running on time, then I will be worried. These days they don't do that anywhere; not even in Germany.

fizzissist
04-20-2007, 12:34 AM
When trains start running on time, then I will be worried. These days they don't do that anywhere; not even in Germany.

They do in Japan, and as much as I could tell, in Thailand too last time I was there. But I get your point.

dynosor
04-20-2007, 02:38 AM
"For the first time, humanity is instituting a genuine instrument of global governance, one that should find a place within the
World Environmental Organisation which France and the European Union would like to see established."


That sentiment was expressed by Jacques Chirac in his 2000 UN address on climate change.


http://www.sovereignty.net/center/chirac.html (http://www.sovereignty.net/center/chirac.html)

5th paragraph from the end.


The motive seems clear enough to me; no hidden meaning; no interpretation required.

NinerSevenTango
04-20-2007, 09:03 AM
"A discipline they cannot escape"

--97T--

Geof
04-20-2007, 09:18 AM
They do in Japan, and as much as I could tell, in Thailand too last time I was there. But I get your point.

Cannot comment on Thailand, but not always on time in Japan. Better than Germany though. :)

fizzissist
04-20-2007, 09:18 AM
"......World Environmental Organisation which France and the European Union would like to see established."

Sounds like France would like to pre-surrender. Not a bad idea, except that they want us to also.

The obvious problem here is how climate change is being tied to security, economics, health, and everything else from penguins to rap music. That is a perfect seguey into a new world order.

And who more qualified to lead us? Why, ManBearPig, of course.

fizzissist
04-24-2007, 01:57 PM
The best way to give the poor a real voice is through a world parliament
Global governance as it stands is tyranny speaking the language of democracy. We need a directly elected assembly

George Monbiot
Tuesday April 24, 2007
The Guardian

"...The campaign for a UN parliamentary assembly is being launched this week on five continents. It is backed by nearly 400 MPs from 70 countries, a long and eclectic list of artists and intellectuals - among them Günter Grass, Karlheinz Stockhausen, Alfred Brendel and Arthur C Clarke - several government ministers and party leaders, including our own Ming Campbell, six former foreign secretaries, the president of the Pan-African Parliament and a former UN secretary general. After 160 years of ridicule, Tennyson's crazy idea is beginning to look plausible.

Those of us who want a world parliament are often accused of trying to invent a system of global governance. But there is already a system of global governance. The UN security council, the World Bank, the IMF and the World Trade Organisation...."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2064087,00.html

NinerSevenTango
04-25-2007, 07:50 AM
Wouldn't it be nice if we could elevate envy and hatred to the level of international law backed by force?

CJL5585
04-25-2007, 03:39 PM
Wouldn't it be nice if we could elevate envy and hatred to the level of international law backed by force?

Don't Worry! There is a prophesy that says one man shall rule the world, and have military backing.

Madclicker
04-25-2007, 04:13 PM
Don't Worry! There is a prophesy that says one man shall rule the world, and have military backing.

I knew it! Al Gore is the anti-christ!

NinerSevenTango
04-28-2008, 07:59 AM
And now, the next U.S. president is virtually guaranteed to plod down the globalist path. The fix is in.

--97T--

rancherbill
04-29-2008, 01:12 AM
97T

Why are you bumping year old threads?

It has been 368 days since the last post.

Having a slow day at the Bridge?

fizzissist
04-29-2008, 01:52 AM
I knew it! Al Gore is the anti-christ!

I believe the correct phrase would be "Al Gore is the anti-crust!"

NinerSevenTango
04-29-2008, 07:31 AM
Yeah, a slow day. I saw 4/25 and didn't realize it was a year old. Heh.

Note to self: TWO cups of coffee before posting.

Bill Johns
06-04-2008, 11:37 PM
Instead of them worrying about the SUN caused climate changes. Why not worrry about something more important. Like opening up the millions of acres of land that are being locked up and restricted, and having it be unencumbered untaxed and pennys to the dollar like the rail roads got it for, so there is no homeless person on the face of the earth. A spotted owl "they" say needs many acres of land. Yet "they" say us humans can live in a small box. And they wonder why there is crime, homelessness, and other such things.

ViperTX
06-05-2008, 10:49 PM
Darn Bill....are you a Democrat....there are so many reasons people are homeless....some may have a cure and others are simply incurable...

Bill Johns
06-07-2008, 05:17 AM
Demonrat, ha ha ha. No they are enviro wackos, as you can see I'm not that.
They are also by definition "anti-constitutionalists". Na I just believe in the real meaning of the word that is so bandied around these days. FREEDOM and to an american land should be a birthright, and very inexpensive, cause without it you aren't free. Simple as that.

rancherbill
06-07-2008, 07:26 AM
Demonrat, ha ha ha. No they are enviro wackos, as you can see I'm not that.
They are also by definition "anti-constitutionalists". Na I just believe in the real meaning of the word that is so bandied around these days. FREEDOM and to an american land should be a birthright, and very inexpensive, cause without it you aren't free. Simple as that.

Hi Bill

You're a Spotted Owl hater. So am I.:):) If we believe that it takes millions of years to evolve, didn't the Owl get awfully cold 10,000 years ago when there was a glacier where they live. We are led to believe they can only live in one particular spot.:confused:

I don't see how you could get cheap land today that anybody would want to live on and/or make a living on. As soon as you sold off the land, somebody would want to put up time share getaways.:):):)

Bill Johns
01-16-2009, 02:53 AM
Ah thats the main stiplulation that you have to give the land back or trade for other land if for some reason you don't want it. And can not sell it or profit from it other than a small mom and pop business. Just live and grow your own food on it. Cut trees for just fired wood or building the house.
If you removed all the trees in a forest that a spotted owl lives in, he would then become a ground bird, like a pheasant or grouse or turkey. They will survive no matter what.

One of Many
01-16-2009, 11:31 AM
The stages of governmental rise and fall seems to be primarily lack of teaching historical record and avoiding the same mistakes. The mix of WIIFM (what's in it for me) group think and egocentric elitism in power over the people isn't new by any means. In my experience, status driven individuals aren't there to do any favors for those beneath them, with the intent to keep the status quo in check for fear of being unseated. Freedom is only retained if we can safeguard it from those Ba$tards trying to undermine it one law at a time!

The new use of energy is to gain cooperation at the will of the powerful.

DC

Basic forms of Government

Packers
03-26-2009, 12:22 AM
could someone explain what the new world order is. I always envision a bunch of conspiracy theorist pinning all of the worlds problems on a select few people that are popular/rich/powerful.

NinerSevenTango
03-27-2009, 10:56 AM
could someone explain what the new world order is. I always envision a bunch of conspiracy theorist pinning all of the worlds problems on a select few people that are popular/rich/powerful.

Here's one chilling viewpoint:

http://www.google.com/search?q=594683847743189197

Pick the top result.

One of Many
03-27-2009, 05:48 PM
I will post this in 2 threads, since it is aptly appropriate for both, climate change and the new world order.

Climate under UN Rule (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,510937,00.html)

DC

Packers
03-27-2009, 10:56 PM
I agree with that fox news story. What they report is in motion as we speak.

I believe, with every fiber of my mortal body that global warming is a completely indefensible hoax.

But if global warming is not true, then there must be a distinctly different motivation for purporting the idea. And I think that the motivation is the destruction of free societies and the implimentation of government controlled economies.

Every technological advance that human beings have made was due to the use or the manipulation of energy. Jet engines, refridgeration cycles, electricity, computers, on and on. It all uses energy. If the use of this energy is made a sin, then we have condemned the progress of the entire human race.

Lets face it, we are all just a bunch of cavemen without energy. And what these politicians are trying to do is to remove power from free individuals so that they can control them. Because when we are under control, they have all of the power. The liberal disguise of caring for the enviroment is just a front. Who doesnt care about the enviroment? I dont see people actively trying to harm the earth, yet liberal know it alls will condemn me for driving a car that utilizes the balzyness of a V8 engine. And all I can say is that if these people think that they are gonna control me, they can talk to winchester, remington, walther, and glock.

jhowelb
03-28-2009, 06:44 PM
Have a look at throwing a "tea party"!

One of Many
03-29-2009, 11:31 PM
Dr. Bob Basso's Youtube clips has gotten him called by the President himself and invited(some call it summond) to the Whitehouse to discuss the disturbing nature of his videos. Mr. Basso has a Phd in Communications, so he knows marketing flare and what to put out there for mass attraction.

The second revolution could be at hand if we have the guts to do it.

DC


We the People Stimulus

jhowelb
03-30-2009, 09:14 AM
Dr. Bob Basso for president!

jhowelb
03-30-2009, 09:20 AM
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090330/D978B77O0.html

Obama fires CEO at GM!!!


Mar 30, 7:57 AM (ET)

By TOM KRISHER and DAN STRUMPF

DETROIT (AP) - Time and time again, General Motors Corp. (GM) (GM)'s board of directors reaffirmed its support for Chairman and CEO Rick Wagoner, even as the company piled up billions of dollars in losses and begged for government loans to stay alive.

But Wagoner is now a high-profile casualty of government intervention, forced out as part of the Obama administration's sweeping last-ditch effort to save the century-old auto giant.

borsodas
08-18-2009, 02:18 PM
this thread is insanely stupid and paranoid. ever swam in a polluted lake or seen the destruction and toxins from a landfill? its about health for the earth and humanity you freak. get a life.

CNC (http://cncmachining.wordpress.com)FOR LIFE

jhowelb
08-18-2009, 05:37 PM
this thread is insanely stupid and paranoid. ever swam in a polluted lake or seen the destruction and toxins from a landfill? its about health for the earth and humanity you freak. get a life.

CNC (http://cncmachining.wordpress.com)FOR LIFE


When you have no facts to argue, resort to calling names and ridicule.

Can you say, "Saul Alinsky" and "Rules for Radicals"

You, sir, are transparent.

After this I will offer no further response as I DO NOT FEED TROLLS!