kesparate
04-03-2007, 04:53 PM
so, i'm working on editing a post to my own private specs, and i'm having some issues with the command that ends a caned cycle.
EX_PECK2CANCEL : G80* G00* Z*(aclearance)
it seems to add not one but two "z.1" commands
G81 G98 Z-.02 R.1 F3.
X2.9914 Y-2.9528
G80 G00 Z1.
Z.1
G00 Z.1
M09
G49 Z0 M05
M01
they're not even in the same line!!!!
it isn't from the cycle end command
EX_CYCLEEND :G00 Z*(aclearance)
this yields
X7.1
G00 Z1.5
G00 Z1.5
M09
G49 Z0 M05
M01
yeah i've got two Z1.5 commands in this block and i know that one is from the software and one is from the post.
i suspect that what it's doing is using the "r" value where it says "aclearance" and it's doing the same thing in the software which is why there are two just like the cycle end which uses the same command.
now what i'd like to know is, is there a command "?clearance" that will cause it to use the full clearance value instead of the clearance value?
think g98 instead of g99 return. note though that i am outputting g98 as the return (most of the time)
any help would be greatly appreciated.
EX_PECK2CANCEL : G80* G00* Z*(aclearance)
it seems to add not one but two "z.1" commands
G81 G98 Z-.02 R.1 F3.
X2.9914 Y-2.9528
G80 G00 Z1.
Z.1
G00 Z.1
M09
G49 Z0 M05
M01
they're not even in the same line!!!!
it isn't from the cycle end command
EX_CYCLEEND :G00 Z*(aclearance)
this yields
X7.1
G00 Z1.5
G00 Z1.5
M09
G49 Z0 M05
M01
yeah i've got two Z1.5 commands in this block and i know that one is from the software and one is from the post.
i suspect that what it's doing is using the "r" value where it says "aclearance" and it's doing the same thing in the software which is why there are two just like the cycle end which uses the same command.
now what i'd like to know is, is there a command "?clearance" that will cause it to use the full clearance value instead of the clearance value?
think g98 instead of g99 return. note though that i am outputting g98 as the return (most of the time)
any help would be greatly appreciated.