View Single Post
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 08-14-2005, 06:17 PM
shootingarts shootingarts is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: usa
Posts: 60
shootingarts is on a distinguished road

Lance,

I don't need .0001 but probably a total tolerance between the two pieces of zero to .0005 or slightly more would be nice. I just used the turning tool as an example of the fine adjustment that can be gained with a cam type device.

If I were to deal with minimums I could actually work with one inch of travel on the vertical axis and two inches on the y axis(across the table). I want ten to twelve inches of accurate cut the length of the table and at that I would have to manually move the table back and forth and lock it down to position it. That should work pretty well with some good stops and a DRO. I actually need to be able to position pieces up to 32" long but my cuts will be much shorter.


Mike,

Sorry for any confusion. I was running out the door as soon as I finished typing this morning and may have been less than clear. The last thing I want to do is prove that we could put ID numbers on brass or bullets!! The turner just happened to be the tool that gave me the idea since it uses an offset like a cam to get super precise positioning. The necks on my brass turned to an interference fit over the base of my bullets was one component used to put together a string of sub-eighth inch five shot groups at 100 yards with my 6PPC. That is under the world record but of course was not shot in competition.

I don't know if a ballscrew or rack can actually work in ten-thousandths. Everything I have found says accuracy to .0002 I believe but then repeatability to .001, a far cry different! I assume the shorter the more accurate and it may come down to the usual. Will it cost me hundreds of dollars each to get the super accurate conventional short linear motion device? If so a simple circle offset one inch from center will give me two inches of total travel. Seems real feasible when I read I can divide a circle into 2000 parts. Of course I would have to calculate and then calibrate the cams but that should be fairly easy as the plain circles should have linear travel increments.

Of course none of this may be feasible, that is the reason for my original post! I have that itch we all get to start cutting metal and I need to layout the basic design of my machine first.

Hu
Reply With Quote

 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361