View Single Post
  #12  
Old 05-06-2005, 03:30 PM
mxtras's Avatar
mxtras mxtras is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Age: 45
Posts: 1,810
mxtras is on a distinguished road

I now prefer to use mainly linear bearings such as THK HRS series. The cost might be a bit higher than other methods but you get what you pay for.

I recently completed a 1350 pound, 63" wide motion system capable of positioning accuracies of less than 1 micron (0.00004", 0.001MM) - for this application, medium preload THK bearings were used to eliminate stick-slip.

I have also used Turcite (sheet material, bonded) for high loads with mixed results.

Moglice (specialized, low shrink epoxy) is an absolutely awesome method, but offers a bit of stick-slip which may create difficulty for extremely precise, small moves. It is far superior for dovetail or box ways where you have the potential for metal to metal contact during initial moves due to the displacement of the way lube. If you ever re-furbish a Bridgeport machine, I would definitely urge you to look into the benefits of this type of material for way construction/repair/alignment - and it is not that expensive or difficult to use.

Using rollers on cold rolled material or the round bearings (Thompson) mentioned in a previous post would be adequate for certain applications, but I have had problems with both of these methods. I previously designed a composite processing machine which used the Thompson type (round) bearings to guide a shuttle over 30' at relatively slow speeds and the rails began to exhibit signs of wear after only 8 months of use - with an automatic lubricator and dynamic loads that were less than 1/5 of the maximum recommendations. I was a bit disappointed. The second machine of similar design used THK HSR type bearing blocks (I think they were NSK or another brand) - more initial cost, but provided much longer life - and less noise....and no warranty replacement costs, so they were actually less costly in the long run. Granted this was a production machine not a hobby machine but the lesson is there.

I would venture to say that the selection depends on your goals and your budget. Each method of guiding has its place and its advantages. Each method has disadvantages of course - sometimes it is only cost, sometimes the design dictates a specific method. The selection of guiding components primarily depends on speeds, forces, accuracy requirements and budget constraints.

Guiding is no place to skimp when sitting down to design a machine in my opinion.

Keep this going - let’s hear from everyone!
Reply With Quote

 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361