View Single Post
  #7   Ban this user!
Old 03-31-2005, 04:44 PM
murphy625 murphy625 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Age: 50
Posts: 446
murphy625 is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by intrusion
Actually Bob Pierre is absolutly correct in his statements. I strongly agree
The CamSoft interface can be made to look really cool if you use your imagination. You can create your own bitmapped images for buttons and back ground skins. You can change the color of the Readouts and G-code display window. These are also sizable and positionable through the Design Operator Interface section.
Ok.. Now see this is exactly what I was talking about.. I just spent 20 minutes getting my axis readout display in the correct place..
Left = 7100 <<Not enough left.. Exit and go back into the setup.exe.. Change to Left = 7200. Start the GUI again.. Ooops.. not enough.. Exit the GUI.. Back into the Setup.exe.. Change to Left=8000.. Start up the GUI again.. Oops.. To much.. Exit the program, Bla bla bla bla...
And as soon as I change screens because I took it home to work on it, it wont be the same and I"ll have to spend another 20 minutes putting that readout display in the upper right corner again... (Ok.. I understand why and that the program wasnt designed to be tranfered back and forth between computer systems with different screen resolutions so I wont say much more about that.. ) BUT, why is it the display windows cant be dragged and re-sized on the fly like every other windows application I have??

Im getting the hang of it slowly.. Also, please understand that as far as CNC interfaces go, I have nothing to compare the camsoft to but other windows programs... Camsoft could be the Sliced Bread of CNC controls and I wouldnt know it because of a lack of reference.

Any other tips for designing??

One thing I have figured out.... where Camsoft falls short, this forum makes up for it.
I wonder why Camsoft does not mention this forum in the user manual for there software?? This place is a great resource for newbies like me...

And another thing, Why is it that the header for the Macros [[Macro1]] is above the code and the header for the Mcodes -----M13 is below the code?? And what is the ----- part of the mcode header for? Is it required as the [[ and ]] in the macro headers?

Ok.. lots of questions but this is more fun then diagnosing encoder / resolver signals.. LOL

Thanks!
Murphy

Last edited by murphy625; 03-31-2005 at 05:05 PM. Reason: 1 more question..
Reply With Quote

 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361