View Single Post
  #10   Ban this user!
Old 10-11-2009, 04:41 PM
hab82 hab82 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 35
hab82 is on a distinguished road

Certainly everything is in the planning stage at this time. I saw a post where somebody had converted an X3 to a 2hp motor that weighed 56 lbs. While I have sent a private mail to him, I see from the stats that he hasn't been online since June. Doing some mental exercises and web browsing I have come up with a tentative plan. In this case I am looking at using 65 tooth Timing belt that measures to have 4 teeth per inch that comes with the X3. In this case I am looking at having a three stage spindle timing pulley of 51, 34, and 28 teeth. For the motor timing pulley having 14, 34 and 39 teeth. While the target ratios were 1000:3600, 3600:3600 and 5000:3600 based on the planned top speed in each range the actual choices were made to keep the minimum belt length approximately the same and approximately 2 inches shorter than the measured belt length. So the actual ratios are 988:3600, 3600:3600 and 5014:3600. I plan on cutting these myself. Since my stepper driven rotary table gives me a resolution of .002 Degrees I think I can come up with evenly spaced teeth.

I am looking at using the Hitachi X200-015NFU as the driver and either the North American PE145TC-2-4 or NA145TC-2-4 data sheets are here http://www.naemotors.com/premium/PE145TC-2-4.pdf and
http://www.naemotors.com/newt/na1800c/NA145TC-2-4.pdf
I would prefer the PE version as it is 6 pounds lighter and has better Inverter specs but I still don't have a price for it. The NA version has a price of $189.00 at
http://www.e-motorsonline.com/product_ACM03786.html
and as that appears to be in budget and priced in the same range as the Grizzley replacement 3/4 hp motor, I don't feel further design work will be wasted. Dimensions indicate that these motors will fit between the spindle and column with room for belt adjustment.

Thus my current plans are make the timing pulleys initially for the stock DC motor as its shaft is smaller and when upgrading to one of these it would just require re-boring and keying the motor pulley. I will build the motor mount to accommodate all three motors.

Then when either the DC motor fails or I get tired of the DC Motors performance I will upgrade to one of the 3 phase motors.

The initial results should give equal or greater performance at low speed as belts are supposed to be more efficient than gears, and give me the desired higher spindle speeds for cutting aluminum.
It also has the added benefit up being much quieter.
Hubert

Last edited by hab82; 10-11-2009 at 04:46 PM. Reason: One last thought
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361