View Single Post
  #8   Ban this user!
Old 10-09-2009, 03:37 AM
Ashish B's Avatar
Ashish B Ashish B is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Alegria
Posts: 368
Ashish B is on a distinguished road
Arrow Hi

Hi

Pat -
I really Admire your Technique about using a DTI probe.
But I am using a Lever type Dial Indicator & I relate problems in the Thread regarding the Lever Type Mechanism.
I have attached a Pic of Lever Type Dial Indicator.
Also Pat the Tag “Alternative to Spindle Probes”, is only mentioned because I used the Same pattern of Centre Finding. I don’t compare the Cost. What I suggested is a Zero Investment Plan.
I scare that u are not understanding me correctly. Also Your comments about to achieve the True centre of the Hole needs Retakes is what I Disagree.
As per my predication, we should be able to calculate the Centre within 5 to 8 microns & that too in the First Take itself. I refer to a hole very accurate in Ovality dimension. Generally we ream the hole which has an accuracy of 10 to 15 microns, but just for Instance if u try to align a Hole/Boss which is a Masterpiece, I bet we can achieve great accuracy, provided we Filter out the Previously mentioned Error.


Superman –
Your conception is very natural, but it is a Prejudice.
I was of your perpesective when this Idea Striked my Brain. To revalidate it I sketched a Geometry in CAD software. Please Refer attachment for further clarification.
Also to narrate you 1 story, when I used to work in a Public Limited Company. We had 3 machines & they used to make money day & Night. When I joined, it was a shock for me to believe that Operators used to switch off the machines (in night shift) because they were not able to Find the centre of Hole.
As in Night shift, mostly u don’t have a Managerial control so they had such freedom. At the Grass Root Level, operators are unskilled, uneducated & also we cannot expect them to be robotic in nature the whole shift. The clever way is “Filter the Process, so it is Beneficial to them as well as For us.
In ISO Standard & Environment, “Improve Process Capability “is the Correct Word for all these Issues.
To increase the Gravity of my Point, just Imagine that u have pyramid sort of profile mounted on Plate having 2 holes . As we all know, its not only Hole Alignment but also we have Inline Alignment. The worst case in this scenario is that the operator has to tram the Spindle Up-Side-Down on either sides to check the Inline alignment First & after achieving that , u turn to Hole Alignment.
I don’t criticize the Operator Tendency for Delay. Its Very Natural.
If I would have been In his place, I would behave the same way, they do. No owner can expect a employee to be 100 percent efficient the whole day.
“Human is Not A ROBOT”.


sinha nsit –
Hi,
Thanks for you appreciation for the Technique.
I know that Dialing the Dial Tip’s Side to the T slot is very Time Consuming
Can u suggest some other method of Filtering the Angle Error?
As u suggested, we should not take retakes for Computing the centre of Holes. If we endeavour to replace the Old method, we have to achieve Good Accuracy & also Reduce Time.
“Any new Technique runs successfully only when it walks on wheels of Good Accuracy & Reduced Time”.
The Tool Holder in which we clamp the dial (at correct angular position ) can be kept undisturbed or booked. I clarify it that it is not a Investment of Tool Holder but it’s a Booked. No one in the shop floor should remove that Dial, so whenever a new setting is there, just plug the Tool holder & derive centre in fractions of Time.
Also we Consume so much time aligning every Part, so Can’t we spare some time Once for Aligning the Dial to the correct position?.


Charlie Gary –
Hi,
Its nothing Depends on the Hole Size. As attached a Snap of Dial Indicators, u can Pickup Hole/Boss of any size by this Indicator.
Well as I told you before, human is not a robot. Some can find centre within seconds, some takes holes.
Also humans/operator gives up Sometime. Sometimes, operators are tried, they are frustrated because they are consuming more time than regularly required, the employee is shouting at him, he is physically present on the machine but he is thinking of some Personal Problems & the list continues to go on & on……………
Well I don’t want to express the Accuracy of Setup when the operators has so many things to deal. We all are humans & Not Robots.


Hope I clarified the Gravity of My Point & gave branches to Technical Discussion.
Thanks all for your time, Patience & Support.
Ashish B
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Clarfiication.JPG‎
Views:	42
Size:	57.9 KB
ID:	90767   Click image for larger version

Name:	Part.JPG‎
Views:	40
Size:	32.0 KB
ID:	90768   Click image for larger version

Name:	Lever Dial.jpg‎
Views:	37
Size:	17.3 KB
ID:	90769  
Reply With Quote

 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361