View Single Post
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 08-31-2004, 08:16 AM
buscht's Avatar
buscht buscht is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 634
buscht is on a distinguished road

Thanks everybody for the suggestions.

Here is an update.

I got this info from the motor supplier:

" If you could increase your power supply to 28V that will help also. But the easiest thing is to reconfigure the stepper motor wires for center tap to end. This cuts the inductance by a factor of 4 increasing the speed. I would kick the xylotex board up to 2.5A
connect red to A
connect red/white to A#
connect black to B
connect black/white to B#
insulate the ends of the remaining wires but do not connect them to anything"


I tried this and was able to increase my speed from 12" per minute to 32" per minute and still get good torque. I am looking for a 28v/30v power supply as that would give me 15% more voltage.

Xylotex send me a similar response:

" Your motors have a very high inductance. This is the reason they
can be so powerful, yet only require 2 Amps. The problem you are
seeing is due to the time it takes to charge the coils in your
motor. The pulse width really isn't changing anything, except it is
allowing more time for the coils to charge. It thus makes it so you
can't step as fast.
The opitmal (maximum) motor size (torque vs. inductance) for the
Xylotex drive is around 250 oz.in. at around 2.3A to 2.7A per
phase. Higher torque at similar current will require more time to
charge, or a higher voltage.
Although only 2Amps, the inductance of your motor needs a voltage
around 40 to 60VDC to be effective (Gecko territory). You will get
the full rated *holding* torque with the drive, but as step rate
increases, torque drops. This isn't a problem with my drive (other
than not handling 60VDC), it's really a matter of physics."

The interesting point here is the recommend motor size of 250 ox-in max. for good speed performance. That's important to know when developing a DIY machine, (matching components for optimal performance.)

Marvin, thanks for your practical advise. Ignoring the issues with the larger motors, I was jogging and moving my machine at over 100" per minute with the 116oz-in motors no problem, but when I ran a program with lots of little steps I would see a definite loss of steps. I'll experiment some more before I switch over to the big motors entirely.

Trent
Reply With Quote

 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361