View Single Post
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 07-25-2004, 01:44 PM
fyffe555 fyffe555 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 550
fyffe555 is on a distinguished road
CAM Software selection help;

Can I ask for some input selecting CAM software?

I'm at the point where I want/need to buy some but have yet to decide what. Hopefully people here have some better insight,

I currently use a full version of Rhino 3D V3 for 3D modelling, Full Autocad 2000 and have Gmax. For CAM Gcode output I've got Meshcam, Freemill, CNC toolkit, ACE and the GCode Autocad macro from one of the contributors here. I use TurboCNC now, possibly Mach2 later.

Here's the problem; I find I'm producing lots of drawings for potential parts that seem to sit in between full 3d models and 2 1/2d outlines. Parts include some purely 3d elements but also lots of surface that are part of the stock and need no machining. For example imagine a simple cylinder with a flange, like a flanged train wheel, essentially two cylinders stacked, of different dimensions. Or a square version of same with a quadrant cut out, with a few drill holes.

To produce Gcode for this seems to be taking too long and too much effort, so what am I doing wrong, or more precisely what software should I get to do this?

From a Rhino model I presently have the choice of Meshcam and Freemill and both produce Gcode that mills every surface from a square stock, even though the top surface doesn't need milling, and removing a lot of waste material cutting away surplus from the square stock in passes, all of which takes a lot of time too. Drill holes are cut with G01's.

Or I can take the 3d model and put it through Autocad, figure out how to seperate the part and operations into seperate elements, use the gcode macro to produce gcode for each and manually compile and edit what is in essence a set of outline machining operations that together produce the finished part with minimal material waste and no unnecessary machining of surfaces.

I seem to get better finished parts, cut more quickly with the second method but the gcode production can take ages. An advantage with the second method is that cylindrical holes and arcs can be made with a G02/G03 rather than the composite of G01's the first method uses, so holes and curved surfaces look cleaner for the same machining time too.

So, is there a technique or something obvious that I'm missing?

Is there a cam software that I can use to do this with the Cad software I've already bought?

Do you need to build the model in a combined CAD/CAM package to automatically have cylinder holes or arcs cut with G02/G03's?

And finally what software do people recommend. I was thinking of getting VisualMill but am today suffering from sticker shock, this is hobby stuff here so ideally I'd want something on the lower side, <1k.

thanks

Andrew

Last edited by fyffe555; 07-25-2004 at 02:46 PM.
Reply With Quote

 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361