Thread: Need Help! HAAS MEMORY
View Single Post
  #10   Ban this user!
Old 02-02-2008, 02:54 AM
Digitech's Avatar
Digitech Digitech is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: India
Posts: 42
Digitech is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by gar View Post
080201-0804 EST USA

True that drip feed (DNC) works with either XON/XOFF or RTS-CTS.

The major point of XMODEM is that it is an error detection and correction means that provides some advantage over simply using single parity bit checking on a character by character basis with no correction of any type.

Suppose you use single bit parity and the system receiving the character halts on a parity error. This has probably protected you from a potential crash, but the program stops.

Also suppose for whatever reason you lose a whole character and no parity error, and it was a decimal point. Now you may have a major crash. We have a customer with this kind of problem. XON/XOFF or RTS-CTS does nothing for you. These simply modulate the flow of data and nothing to do with noise induced errors.

XMODEM is a communication protocol that sends a fixed and known block of characters including a checksum. A data block is sent from a source to a destination and at the destination there must be a checksum match. If the match is good, then an OK acknowledgement is sent to the source and the source sends the next block, and so on. If the match is wrong, then a NOT OK message is sent to the source and the source resends the block. There is a count limit on the number of retries on the same block. When this is exceeded all communication is halted.

XMODEM will catch missing character errors as well as other random errors. Furthermore, XMODEM checks more of the system from some place within the source computer to some place within the destination. Usually the block of data goes into some buffer memory in the destination to have its checksum verified. The nearer this is to the final memory the better. A simple parity error check is usually only between the source and destination UARTs. Thus, more circuitry is checked with XMODEM than with a simple parity check.

The simple form of XMODEM used by HAAS does not have powerful error checking, but it is much better than the simple parity check between the UARTs.

.
Yes. Xmodem is always better. If your older HAAS does not have Xmodem I do not think, any other external software will give you the same effect.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361