View Single Post
  #7  
Old 05-26-2003, 10:44 PM
HuFlungDung's Avatar
HuFlungDung HuFlungDung is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,825
HuFlungDung is on a distinguished road

Thanks WMS for your input.

I fooled around with it for a while longer, and the only thing I could do was create a new parameter to hold what I would call the initial Z start, which should logically be the same as the Drill-initial plane but for whatever reason, that variable does not contain the fixed amount as taken from the user input.

It is no problem to do it this way, I just get another variable to define later in the cycle's "extras" field.

I only got to messing with this today because I was drilling some holes that started on a surface well below my Z0, and the negative numbers involved were driving my drill cycles wacky.
But anyway, now I have the post set up better than before, so that is a good thing.

I've also changed my habits with regards to the initial Rapid plane and tool offset. I developed perhaps an erronous habit of running my Z home at Z0.1 , my tool length offsets all the way down to Z0.1 and Rapiding around at Z.1 (My one mill has fairly limited 4.5 inch Z axis travel).

Instead, now I define a Z home of Z1.0, define the length offsets relative to Z1. and Rapid around at Z1. This allows me to call the tool length offset without worrying about the tool being so near the surface, and allows a little more leeway for error, should an offset happen to be slightly incorrect when it is called (the tool moves when the offset is read). This change allows me to make better use of the intermediate positions that Onecnc allows for in positioning the tool before the plunge, etc.

Say, we were agreeable on the potential benefits of a"peck-plunge" option when using end mills, what do you think about the option for Rapid plunge, as well?

I find there are times when I do start a multi-pass roughing cycle with the tool "out in the air", and this gets fairly tedious to watch the thing plunging at a typical feedrate. In the meantime, when I foresee such circumstances, I am happy enough to insert a very high plunge feedrate to accomplish the same thing as rapid, but it doesn't seem to me to be as clear to the operator as a Rapid command would, when he's checking through the code on the machine display.
__________________
First you get good, then you get fast. Then grouchiness sets in.

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Reply With Quote

 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361