Hi Khalid,
Thanks for all your information. I have only used the David system and never used the NextEngine. I have been trying to get as much information as I can for the results of NextEngine scanner.
I have only reported my experience with David. I have not had the great experience that you have. I understand that if I take "a lot" of time and invest many hours into getting the right cameras, corner backgrounds, laser, Pc and motorized scanning hardware together, I might get good results. Still, unlike yourself, I have found the Fusion portion of David very frustrating, non-intuitive, and crashy. Maybe with many hours of using I could get better results.
My interest in NextEngine is that it is supposed to be turnkey. Maybe less setup time each time a scan is required. Is it better? I don't know. I do know that David is more difficult to set up each time and calibrate, etc. I also find the forum painful to use...it is often many many days before a brief, limited response is returned. I have already agreed that David may cost less, but there is a price to be paid in all the hours it takes to setup a mechanical scanner, get familiar with the software, and get good results that can be used in CNC in short order. But sorry, no bias... I cannot recommend one or the other so far....![]()


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks





Fusiing the scans is an ART... I wish you purchase the NextEngine and you will see how difficult is fusion .... In the latest softwares like Geomagic and Rapidform you will find different techniques of fusing the scans... This is because their is no single way to get 100% perfect fusion without any hardwork...
so that we can keep going this thread with amazing scans and great comparision..
