The ONLY constant is change.
Consensus is political.
Science is demonstrable, repeatable exercise of facts.
There is NO consensus of science, there MAY me a consensus of scientists who are subject error.
The best state of climate is WHAT, WHERE and FOR WHOM?
And what kind of arrogance decides to "control the weather" for his own benefit?
Or is it just another power play to gain political dominance and financial gain? |