View Single Post
  #7   Ban this user!
Old 04-04-2004, 01:04 PM
vacpress vacpress is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1,147
vacpress is on a distinguished road

yes. i knew that.... i want to do something a little quirky. plus - i dont have the funds to build a 100ipm gantry cutter myself. i have very little $$. i cant even spend $300 at any one time to buy 80/20 parts. i end up using plain-ol 1.25x1.25 alum square tubing.. and acrylic... and lots of hardwarestore alum and steel extrusion.. i think the robot arm is an obvious winner at this point - cheap, fun, etc... a gantry table that does 100ipm is not offered in a $30 planset for good reason..

the robot plans would cost no more than $15-$20 - postpaid..... maybe $25 for europe if it costs that much more to ship there...

if .pdfs were not SOO easy to share. i would do a digital distro also. maybe if i made each set of instructions have a password that was the purchasers creditcard # they would be less inclined to "share" the plans...

if i had help on this beast, i would put it out free.but noone will ever help me. my friends think im crazy, and on the internet people are very selfish.. they just want to get what they want out of most forums.. my favorite is people who think their very first attempt to build a very complex mechtronic device like a cnc machine is gonna replace their dayjob..


you will never build a 100ipm CNC device with hardware store parts for linear actuation - at THE LEAST, you will need ball screw, toothed belt, rack and pinion, or other locomotion.. this is not cheap.. even toothed belts seem to be very pricey.. even 10tpi leadscrew would require 1000rpm for 100ipm. i would not expect any stepper system to be accurate at those speeds. maybe at 600-800rpm, with propper acceleration.

i cant believe a 1inch toothed belt pully is $50. but, hey. it is.
__________________
Design & Development
My Portfolio: www.robertguyser.com | CAD Blog I Contribute to: http://www.jeffcad.info

Last edited by vacpress; 04-04-2004 at 01:11 PM.
Reply With Quote

 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361