View Single Post
  #1  
Old 04-23-2003, 11:54 PM
chuckknigh's Avatar
chuckknigh chuckknigh is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 598
chuckknigh is on a distinguished road
I think I figured it out!

Topic 1:

I think I figured it out! I've been obsessing over how to make sure that the electro-mechanical portion of the CNC router would be compatible. But, given the odd and random collection of parts that I've seen on this site, I couldn't figure out how to make a common interface that would control them all.

I think I've got it! You don't even try to make it "compatible."

You install a "driver" or some sort of a layer between the g-code interpreter, and the parallel port. It's calibrated to your actual equipment...probably number of steps per revolution, or some similar unit that would be common to all drive systems.

Then, you let the computer determine that to move 5 units, you send "so" many pulses to the controller module.

Is this how it actually works? It is a workable solution.

----------------------------------

Topic 2:

Motor specifications. Like I said, I've seen "random parts" mentioned on this forum, which leads me to believe that almost anything can work. But, if starting with a clean sheet of paper, what type of specs would be good for the stepper motors?

Is something like this good?
http://www.bgmicro.com/prodinfo.asp?...tepper&stype=3

48 steps per revolution, 1800g.cm. holding torque. The resolution seems rather low, but if it's driving a screw drive this may not be the case. The price is definitely right. And, is 1800g.cm. a high enough torque?

http://www.bgmicro.com/prodinfo.asp?...tepper&stype=3

This one has 1/3 the torque, but 100 steps per revolution, and it's bipolar. Would this be a better choice?

I'm literally trying to learn the basics, at this point. Building a stepper motor controller is not outside of my abilities -- my concern was with the software interface, and if my guess (above) is right, then I needn't be concerned any more.

Thanks!

-- Chuck Knight
Reply With Quote

 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361