Thread: 5 Axis
View Single Post
  #12  
Old 04-21-2006, 04:54 AM
Dan B Dan B is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 714
Dan B is on a distinguished road

We have been doing 5-axis work for close to 3 years. We originally bought the Tri-tech head for our Fadal 6030. (www.5-axis.com) It does a pretty good job for light duty applications, but what it really accomplished, that is noteworthy, is that it opened the eyes of senior management as to the need to get serious about 5-axis. The increases in efficiency were amazing, so within the year we purchased a Hermle C800U. It's been a superb machine, and has completely changed the way we produce our fixtures. We will be receiving our second Hermle (the C40) in late July. We have already been talking about adding a third Hermle (the new C20) for doing detail work (all angled holes, for example)

None of this has been cheap. The Tri-tech head, when all was said and done, cost in the area of $100K (Canadian $'s). The Hermle C800U ran around $400K and our newest machine set us back $550K.

As far as CAM software to program it, cost will be relative to the type of paths you intend to produce. For example, 3+2 programming can be done with the cheaper products like VisualMill or OneCNC for anywhere from $5K to $10K. If you want simultaneous 5-axis, and you want quality toolpaths, you need to look at products like HyperMill, Tebis, UG, Catia, PowerMill, WorkNC or MasterCam. These products, with simultaneous 5-axis modules, will run anywhere from $25K to over $50K, depending on how many different types of toolpaths you need.

As far as post-processors go, the importance of a good post cannot be overemphasized. A great software can be rendered next to useless if the post produces poor tool movements. I have had a couple of posts written by John at www.postprocessors.com, and have had some really good results. He works with you until you get the results you need, and is reasonably priced, below the industry standard of $1K per axis.

A lot will depend on what you need to do. If full continuous motion is not really needed, then don't use it. We can do both positional and simultaneous, and we do the positional rotations 95% of the time. Save the simultaneous stuff for when it is really needed. You will cut much quicker if your feeds are not dependant on the limitations of the rotating axis, whether a trunnion table of a rotating head.

Hope some of this helps,

Dan
__________________
(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Reply With Quote

 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361