View Single Post
  #4  
Old 10-29-2003, 09:08 PM
HuFlungDung's Avatar
HuFlungDung HuFlungDung is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,825
HuFlungDung is on a distinguished road

Marc,

I don't believe the application to steppers over servos is unique. The crux of the issue is this for both kinds of motors: an accel/decel ramp must exist.

This may not seem evident at first, but it is there all the time.

Thus, the motion card needs to be told at what rate to accel/decel for every move. And, if the move is truly going to end, then you must tell it to decelerate, and not just "end motion", which is like a command to decelerate at an infinite rate. This causes the amplifier to send or receive a huge pulse which causes nuisance tripping of the overload detector.

The advantage of the Galil/Camsoft setup, is that it is possible to eliminate this accel/decel between feed commands when you choose to. When this is the case, then all the movement vectors are just downloaded into the card one after the other, with never any thought given to accel/decel. This is what creates smmmoooth machine motion when running short segment nc code, at a high rate. Regular cnc's lacking this capability tend to get into a vibrating, shaking mode when trying to execute hundreds of blocks per second, because the accel/decel is always trying to cut back in between the movements, because the processor is taking too long to send the next move, and there is a miniscule pause, which allows decel to begin, then accel to be applied immediately when the next movement is read.

I have seen the effect of "smooth on" while running my Camsoft lathe. I was turning a very long slender shaft, for which I had to create a special curved toolpath for, to compensate for the deflection of the part. This resulted in several intersections in the cut length, from one end to the other. With "smooth off", there would be just the tiniest toolmark at each intersection, as the next move was read, and the decelstop was applied. With "smooth on", there were absolutely no toolmarks at any intersections, because the whole profile executed with only a single accel at the start and a decel at the other end of it.
__________________
First you get good, then you get fast. Then grouchiness sets in.

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)

Last edited by HuFlungDung; 10-29-2003 at 09:26 PM.
Reply With Quote

 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361