View Single Post
  #5   Ban this user!
Old 11-10-2005, 07:41 AM
NEATman NEATman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 437
NEATman is on a distinguished road

ImanCarrot-
I am farmilliar with that type of tool, and the cutter compensation LVDT. I think that it would be quite difficult and messy to lap the tool directly on the machine. I think that your best bet would be to design a tool holder that is removable, but very repeatable. The best way to describe a kinematic mount like this, is just like the mount for the LVDT probe. Six ceramic rods, and three ceramic balls, and a way to clamp it in the center repeatibly with the same force. This same mount could be incorporated into a lap fixture. You would then also need vertical movement to accomodate for the new tool height.

Before I go too far with a new tolholder, which adjustment is causing you the most difficulty? And how accurately do you need it to repeat? If the height and radius are not the concerns, then the XZ position must be the problem. You could make an additional toolsetting fixture that mounts to the spindle on the kinematic mount (for the LVDT) and measures the location of the tool. Perhaps two more LVDT's, one for X and one for Z, so you could simply mount the tool, adjust the height, and bring it over to the two LVDT's, and measure the offset. That new offset should be easily programmable into your tool settings, and that should get the tool within about .00005" if I remember how well that kinematic mount repeats.

The more I think about it, that LVDT tool compensation system has the probe mounted horizontally, so you already have the Z direction done. You could set the Z location of the tool with the LVDT you already have. If you were to get another LVDT, and make another mount like the one you have, except that the probe is mounted perpendicular to the current orientation, you would have an X offset value. Athough due to the geometry of the tool, 90° may not be the optimum angle, as it would miss the radius on the tool. You could mount it at an angle, so that the probe tip still contacts the radius, and do a little trig to figure out the X offset. If the height is also a problem, you could perhaps make one more fixture with another electronic gage head to measure the height of the tool, and dial it in. If I remember correctly, the toolholder you most likely have has a differential thread and knurled knob at the rear, and will adjust the height very accurately.

Neatman
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361